Skip to main content

Security report for roselove.com

沈阳好花科技有限公司 · Retail · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roselove.com is a Chinese e-commerce platform specializing in high-end fresh flower online ordering and delivery services. The company, identified as Shenyang Haohua Technology Co., Ltd., offers a variety of floral products including romantic, friendship, business, wedding flowers, and preserved flowers. The website targets general consumers in China seeking timely and customized floral gifts, with a market position as a mid-tier specialized flower retailer. The platform supports 24-hour ordering with delivery as fast as within 1-3 hours, emphasizing freshness and romantic symbolism. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components, with custom JavaScript and CSS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and no advanced frameworks are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. Forms do not show anti-CSRF tokens, and no incident response or security policies are published. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, though the presence of ICP and public security备案 numbers supports legitimacy within China. Overall, the website is functional and professional with good content quality and business credibility. Security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The domain registration opacity reduces trust slightly but does not negate the apparent legitimate business operations. Strategic improvements in security and privacy transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roselove.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roselove operates in the retail sector focusing on online flower sales and delivery in China. Its competitive advantage lies in rapid delivery, product variety, and customization options. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with additional services like business and wedding floral arrangements. Revenue streams likely include product sales and possibly premium delivery fees. Target customers are individuals seeking gifts and event organizers. The company maintains partnerships with related service sites and flower shops, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a broad product catalog and active customer service channels. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and moderate market presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the lack of security headers and anti-CSRF protections exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are minimal with no visible GDPR compliance or cookie consent. The absence of analytics reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Incident response readiness is unknown due to lack of published contacts. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery.
  3. Publish clear privacy and security policies including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and improve mobile optimization and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
沈阳好花科技有限公司
Description
roselove官网专注高端鲜花网上预订速递服务，运用每一朵独特的鲜花为您打造浪漫的真爱信物，以“见证真爱”为主张，诠释真爱无距离，支持24小时网上订花送花，快至1小时免费送花上门，个性鲜花礼品定制。
Key services
Online fresh flower ordering and delivery, Customized flower gifts, 24-hour delivery service, Business and wedding floral arrangements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Slider, Custom JavaScript, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies not verifiable from data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language
  2. No WHOIS data available, raising domain registration concerns
  3. No privacy or cookie banners detected despite privacy policy presence
  4. No visible security headers implemented
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. Business information is consistent with a mid-sized Chinese e-commerce flower retailer
  7. Multiple external links to related business and resource sites
  8. Online chat and phone support prominently featured
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive elements. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and user experience. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially for mobile devices. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a custom or legacy build. Hosting details are not disclosed. The lack of advanced accessibility features and security headers suggests technical debt and modernization opportunities. Enhancing these areas would reduce technical risks and improve operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roselove.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roselove.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.