Ronda Carità e Solidarietà is a small, established non-profit organization based in Milan, Italy, dedicated to assisting homeless individuals. With over 20 years of experience, the organization offers a range of social services including mobile outreach units, street education, safe reception points, food distribution, and winter assistance programs. The website reflects a clear mission and strong community engagement through calls to action for donations and volunteering. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Analytics, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and contact information appear consistent and trustworthy. Security posture is moderate, with cookie consent implemented but lacking explicit privacy policy and security headers. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
61
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention rondacaritamilano.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for rondacaritamilano.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on social assistance for homeless populations in Milan. Its market position is that of a local, well-established charity with a volunteer-driven business model. Revenue streams likely include donations, 5x1000 tax contributions, and partnerships. The target audience includes donors, volunteers, and beneficiaries in the Milan area. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include active social media presence and ongoing projects. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve transparency and trust by publishing detailed privacy and security policies.
Security posture
The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics and social media links), but no HTTP security headers were detected in the HTML source. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some GDPR awareness, but no explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts are provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist in privacy documentation and security best practices. Incident response readiness appears minimal due to lack of contact channels. The security culture is basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical controls.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
Verify and ensure proper SSL/TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
Regularly update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain technical hygiene.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Ronda Carità e Solidarietà
Description
Ronda Carità e Solidarietà è una associazione che da più di vent'anni si occupa delle persone senza dimora di Milano
Key services
Mobile unit outreach, Street education, Safe reception point, Food distribution, Winter cold assistance, Volunteer engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 3.1.1, Google Analytics, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome 4.7.0, YUI CSS Reset
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
Cookie consent banner implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
No WHOIS data available for domain, unusual for active site
Cookie consent banner present and functional
No explicit privacy policy page found
Contact information is clear and consistent
Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube
Use of standard web technologies and analytics
No security headers detected in HTML source
No signs of adult or questionable content
No visible security incident or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery 3.1.1, Owl Carousel for sliders, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include outdated libraries and missing security headers, which could impact site security and user trust.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with rondacaritamilano.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rondacaritamilano.com.