Skip to main content

Security report for rolsped.com

Roland Spedition GmbH · Transportation · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roland Spedition GmbH is a well-established Austrian logistics company specializing in combined rail and intermodal transport services. With over 26 years of domain presence, the company positions itself as a leader in hinterland traffic within Austria, offering a comprehensive range of services including operating, trucking, intermodal solutions, and additional services such as customs clearance and hazardous goods transport. The website content is professionally presented in German, targeting businesses requiring efficient and climate-friendly freight transport solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common industry-standard libraries and plugins, but suffers from a lack of proper SSL/TLS configuration, which significantly impacts its security posture. The company maintains clear contact information and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rolsped.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector with a medium-sized business model focused on rail freight and intermodal logistics. It leverages partnerships with industry networks such as CombiNet and academic institutions like FH Vienna, enhancing its market credibility. The business model emphasizes high-frequency, reliable transport services with a focus on sustainability and customer service. The website's content and structure support clear navigation and user engagement, with dedicated sections for services, team, news, and career opportunities. The presence of multiple contact points and detailed team information suggests a customer-centric approach. The company appears to have a stable market position in Austria and Germany, with growth potential through digitalization and climate-friendly transport solutions.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The lack of modern TLS protocols, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption further weakens the security framework. While some security headers like Referrer-Policy are present, critical headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are missing. No published security policies or incident response contacts are available, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but overall privacy compliance could be improved. These vulnerabilities pose business risks including loss of customer trust and potential regulatory non-compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and security features such as HSTS with preload.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed cookie and data retention policies and ensuring all tracking is transparent and consent-based.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Roland Spedition GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Apache via World4You Internet Services GmbH and built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing common front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Slider. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for rich search results. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features at a basic level. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential caching or measurement issues. The absence of HTTPS and modern security protocols is a critical technical debt. The site uses Google Analytics conditionally based on cookie consent, reflecting moderate digital maturity. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization and security hardening to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rolsped.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rolsped.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.