Skip to main content

Security report for roding-mobility.de

RODING Mobility GmbH · Transportation · Germany

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RODING Mobility GmbH is a German-based company specializing in innovative mobility solutions, including powertrain and battery systems, advanced composites, mobility prototypes, and small-series electric vehicle platforms. The company targets automotive, aerospace, and maritime sectors, providing specialized engineering and manufacturing services. Their market position is that of a niche player with expertise in high-voltage systems and composite materials. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms, and cookie consent management, although some security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, supporting the company's business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roding-mobility.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RODING Mobility operates in the transportation and energy sectors, focusing on B2B engineering and manufacturing services. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized knowledge of lightweight composites and high-voltage battery systems for niche markets. The business model revolves around small to medium series production and prototype development, catering to innovative mobility projects. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides clear contact channels via forms and social links. Growth indicators include a multilingual website and detailed service offerings. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small-sized enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form. Cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie, providing GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enhancing HTTP security headers to strengthen their security posture and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RODING Mobility GmbH
Description
RODING Mobility is a company focused on innovative mobility solutions including powertrain and battery systems, advanced composites, mobility prototypes, and small-series and EV platforms. They serve automotive, aerospace, and maritime sectors with high-voltage systems and battery storage in small and medium series.
Key services
Powertrain and battery systems development and production, Advanced composites manufacturing, Mobility prototypes engineering, Small-series and EV platform production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 3.7.1, Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible, Borlabs Cookie Consent, WPML Multilingual CMS, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for multilingual support and cookie consent
  3. Has comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms
  4. Contact form secured with Google reCAPTCHA invisible
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  8. No phone numbers or email addresses explicitly listed on main pages
  9. WHOIS data is limited but domain appears legitimate
  10. Website content is professional and well-structured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using Bootstrap and WPBakery Page Builder, ensuring a responsive and modern design. It leverages jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for interactive and security features. Hosting appears to be managed via your-server.de based on nameserver data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management and WPML for multilingual support. Technical debt is minimal, but the site could benefit from improved security headers and accessibility enhancements to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roding-mobility.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roding-mobility.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.