Skip to main content

Security report for rodgersandjohnston.co.uk

Rodgers & Johnston Ltd · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rodgers & Johnston Ltd is a well-established property maintenance company founded in 1968, specializing in multi-trade planned and reactive repairs primarily for housing associations and local authorities in central Scotland. Their services include reactive maintenance, planned maintenance, out-of-hours emergency repairs, medical adaptations, and void works. The company emphasizes personal service, tenant well-being, and holds multiple industry certifications such as ISO 45001, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001, reflecting a commitment to quality and safety. Technically, the website is built on a modern Bootstrap framework with jQuery and other common libraries, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking, and no CMS is detected. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which indicates gaps in compliance with data protection regulations. Security headers are not evident, and WHOIS data for the domain is missing or invalid, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site shows basic good practices such as no exposed sensitive data and no vulnerable libraries detected. The absence of security headers and privacy policies, however, lowers the overall security posture. The WHOIS inconsistency suggests a need for domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance. The overall risk is moderate with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy and cookie policies, verify domain registration, and establish incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rodgersandjohnston.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rodgers & Johnston Ltd operates in the real estate maintenance sector, focusing on social housing and local authority contracts. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing history, regional coverage across central Scotland, and comprehensive multi-trade service offerings. The business model is service-oriented, targeting housing associations and tenants with a focus on quality and tenant satisfaction. The company has a partnership relationship with Cardo Group, indicating strategic growth or acquisition. Revenue streams likely derive from maintenance contracts and emergency repair services. The company demonstrates strong trust signals through certifications and client lists but lacks digital marketing and analytics sophistication. Growth potential exists through expanded partnerships and enhanced digital presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website does not expose sensitive information and uses standard libraries without known vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response readiness is not evident as no security or abuse contact information is provided. The security culture is implied through certifications but not reflected in the website's technical security measures. Addressing these gaps would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify and correct domain WHOIS registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and abuse contact information.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rodgers & Johnston Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rodgers & Johnston Ltd
Description
Rodgers & Johnston Ltd provide a multi-trade planned and reactive repairs service specialising in working with RSLs and local authorities. They offer 24-hour emergency repairs, void works, medical adaptations, and multi-trade repair work. Founded in 1968, the company focuses on housing maintenance for local authorities and housing associations primarily in central Scotland.
Key services
Reactive Maintenance, Planned Maintenance, Out Of Hours Service, Medical Adaptations, Void Works
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Roboto, Raleway), WOW.js, jQuery bxSlider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the company and services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No forms detected on the main page; customer login button links to a portal.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Multiple industry certifications displayed prominently.
  6. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers visible in the provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or invalid for the domain queried.
  10. Website uses a modern Bootstrap-based responsive design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Font Awesome for icons. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The lack of analytics and marketing tools suggests minimal technical debt but also limited digital maturity. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security configurations. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete domain registration data which could impact business operations and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rodgersandjohnston.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rodgersandjohnston.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.