Skip to main content

Security report for robinassist.com

Robin Assist · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Robin Assist is a service provider offering 24/7 support and assistance solutions tailored for travelers worldwide. The company positions itself as a global player in traveler support services, providing seamless integration options for embedding assistance solutions into client websites or hosting them on dedicated pages. The website is professionally designed, targeting travelers and travel-related businesses seeking reliable support services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting overall trust. No privacy policy or contact information is explicitly provided, which affects privacy compliance and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency with privacy and security policies, adding clear contact and incident response information, and enhancing security headers and accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching robinassist.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Robin Assist operates in the transportation sector, focusing on traveler assistance services. Its business model revolves around providing support solutions that can be integrated into partner websites or hosted independently. The company targets travel agencies, corporate travel managers, and individual travelers needing 24/7 assistance. The website content and social media presence suggest a small-sized company with a professional brand image. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of detailed company registration information limit the ability to fully verify business legitimacy. The company leverages modern web technologies and marketing tools but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market trust and competitive positioning.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are critical for mature security posture and compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in transparency, policy documentation, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response process and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Robin Assist
Description
Providing 24/7 support services to travelers worldwide. Robin Assist provides assistance solutions for today’s traveler with innovative solutions and seamless integration.
Key services
24/7 support services, Assistance solutions for travelers, Seamless integration into websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn confirmed
  7. Website built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO
  8. Google Tag Manager used for analytics
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  10. No security policy or incident response information available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and a professional design. Performance is moderate with no explicit hosting provider identified. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed privacy/security documentation. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active business site and represents a technical and trust risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires enhancements in security and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with robinassist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review robinassist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.