Skip to main content

Security report for roadplan.ee

Roadplan · Transportation · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Roadplan is an Estonian company specializing in road project design, outdoor space projects, and consulting services. Founded in 2013, it positions itself as a leading road project designer in Estonia, targeting clients who require sustainable and innovative solutions for their outdoor environments. The website content is primarily in Estonian and focuses on communicating the company's expertise and service offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is hosted by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian hosting provider. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and employs reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the website is professional and functional but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, explicit contact information, and detailed security disclosures. These gaps reduce its privacy compliance and slightly impact trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roadplan.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Roadplan operates in the transportation sector, focusing on road and outdoor space project design and consulting. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to clients in Estonia seeking sustainable and innovative infrastructure solutions. The company has maintained a consistent market presence since 2013, leveraging its expertise to position itself as a top road project designer locally. The website reflects a clear branding strategy with consistent messaging and a focus on client needs. The absence of explicit certifications or trust badges suggests potential areas for growth in establishing stronger market credibility. The company appears to rely on direct client engagement through contact forms rather than public contact details, indicating a controlled client acquisition approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented on forms to mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection indicates room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact, which are important for transparency and rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve browser security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and communication.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Roadplan
Description
Usume hästitoimiva ja jätkusuutliku elukeskkonna loomisesse. Kuulame klienti, sõnastame vajadused ning leiame ajakohased uuenduslikud lahendused. Teeme välisruumi projekte ning pakume väärtust loovat konsultatsiooniteenust.
Key services
Road project design, Outdoor space projects, Consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Swiper.js, Owl Carousel, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Estonian language targeting local clients
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact is primarily via a contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found
  4. Uses standard WordPress plugins and Google services for analytics and fonts
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No visible certifications or trust badges
  7. Website is HTTPS secured with valid SSL
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing common plugins and libraries such as Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js, and Owl Carousel. The hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar and hosting company. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some modern security best practices. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized service websites, with opportunities to modernize security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roadplan.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roadplan.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.