Skip to main content

Security report for rnma.fr

Réseau National des Maisons des Associations · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Réseau National des Maisons des Associations (RNMA) operates as a national non-profit network dedicated to supporting local associative life in France. The organization provides resources, events, and research to strengthen community engagement and associative activities. Their website reflects a professional and well-structured platform with clear navigation, event listings, and active social media channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern plugins and themes, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though explicit security headers are lacking and no public security policy is found. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, warranting further verification. Overall, the RNMA website is a credible and valuable resource for its target audience but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rnma.fr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RNMA holds a significant position in the French non-profit sector, focusing on associative support and community development. Its business model revolves around networking, resource sharing, and advocacy rather than commercial revenue. The organization targets local associations and community actors, leveraging partnerships and events to enhance its impact. The presence of certifications like Qualiopi and active engagement on social media platforms indicate a mature and recognized entity. The website content and structure support its mission effectively, though the lack of domain registration transparency is a notable gap. RNMA's ecosystem includes collaborations with research institutions and event organizers, positioning it as a central hub in the associative landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response plan limits transparency and preparedness visibility. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a security and trust concern, as it impedes verification of domain ownership and legitimacy. Enhancing security headers and publishing security documentation would strengthen the posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Réseau National des Maisons des Associations
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Réseau National des Maisons des Associations
Description
Le RNMA réunit des structures engagées dans l’accompagnement de la vie associative locale, un pilier fondamental de la citoyenneté.
Key services
Accompaniment of local associative life, Resource sharing, Events and webinars, Research and analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Themify Ultra theme, Ultimate Member plugin, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin, Matomo analytics
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR cookie consent, Ultimate Member for user management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and events
  2. Strong focus on non-profit associative support in France
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with opt-in consent
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and theme
  5. No visible security policy or incident response info
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitter
  9. Use of Matomo analytics with consent enforcement
Technical notes

Notes

The RNMA website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Themify Ultra theme and several plugins such as Ultimate Member for user management, Contact Form 7 for forms, and Complianz for GDPR compliance. The site uses jQuery and integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking with consent enforcement. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but has room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rnma.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rnma.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.