Skip to main content

Security report for rmalaz.com

RE/MAX Alliance Group · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RE/MAX Alliance Group is a well-established real estate brokerage operating in Arizona since 1993, specializing in residential, commercial, and luxury properties. The company leverages the global RE/MAX brand and offers a comprehensive range of services including property management, investments, and vacation rentals. The website reflects a mature digital presence with detailed agent profiles, extensive property listings, and integrated social login capabilities. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Bootstrap, supported by analytics and monitoring tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and New Relic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers properly configured, though improvements are recommended in privacy compliance, particularly regarding cookie consent. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rmalaz.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as the oldest RE/MAX office in Arizona, targeting home buyers and sellers across multiple property types. Its business model focuses on brokerage services with revenue streams from property sales and management. The presence of numerous agent profiles and active listings indicates a medium-sized operation with a broad geographic reach within Arizona. Partnerships with Inside Real Estate and social login providers enhance its digital capabilities. The company emphasizes client service and local expertise, supported by a consistent brand image and trust signals such as MLS disclaimers and professional agent bios.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Content Security Policy, and other security headers. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and a publicly available security or incident response policy are gaps that could affect compliance and user trust. The site uses third-party scripts and analytics, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but can be enhanced by addressing privacy compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy laws and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency and responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RE/MAX Alliance Group
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RE/MAX Alliance Group
Description
RE/MAX Alliance Group, the oldest RE/MAX office in Arizona since 1993 includes a variety of agents who specialize in residential and commercial real estate. We are a full service company including representation of residential Sellers and Buyers, property management, investments, vacation rentals and land.
Key services
Residential real estate sales, Commercial real estate sales, Property management, Investments, Vacation rentals, Land sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, New Relic Browser monitoring, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Secure cookies enabled
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, IRE Professional Services scripts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a real estate brokerage site for RE/MAX Alliance Group in Arizona
  2. Includes detailed agent profiles with photos and bios
  3. Multiple property listings with images and details
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner found
  6. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers and physical address
  8. Social login options for Facebook and Google are implemented
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
  10. No signs of malware or phishing detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js for reactive UI components and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Maps API for location services and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, enhancing performance and scalability. Analytics and monitoring are implemented via Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and New Relic Browser. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The CMS platform appears to be Inside Real Estate (IRE), a specialized real estate platform. Technical debt is minimal, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rmalaz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rmalaz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.