Skip to main content

Security report for rjevansroofing.com

RJ Evans Flat Roofing Limited · Real Estate · United Kingdom

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RJ Evans Flat Roofing Limited is a UK-based commercial roofing contractor specializing in engineered roofing systems for commercial and industrial buildings nationwide. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including installation, repair, inspection, and maintenance of flat and low-slope roofing systems tailored to meet UK regulatory and environmental demands. Their market position is strong, supported by multiple industry accreditations and positive customer testimonials, targeting commercial property owners and facilities managers across the UK. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google Analytics, Bootstrap, and hCaptcha, indicating a moderate to advanced digital maturity. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could enhance its technical posture. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and form protection via hCaptcha, alongside cookie consent mechanisms supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit incident response or security policy pages suggest areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and trust signals mitigate this concern. Overall, RJ Evans presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with solid business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in security practices and domain registration transparency would further strengthen their security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rjevansroofing.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RJ Evans operates in the commercial roofing sector within the UK, serving a broad range of commercial and industrial clients. Their competitive advantage lies in their nationwide delivery model, engineering expertise, and compliance with UK building regulations and fire safety standards. The business model focuses on service provision with revenue streams from new installations, repairs, maintenance contracts, and inspections. The company targets property owners, managing agents, and facilities teams, emphasizing long-term asset protection and operational continuity. Their partnership ecosystem includes industry accreditations and presence on trusted review platforms, enhancing market credibility. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service portfolio and strong online presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and enhance security transparency to build further trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and implements hCaptcha for form security, indicating awareness of basic security practices. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of dedicated security or incident response pages highlight compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. To improve, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security policies, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program. These steps will reduce risk and demonstrate a proactive security posture to clients and partners.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Consider registering and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RJ Evans Flat Roofing Limited
Registration number
08124859
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RJ Evans Flat Roofing Limited
Description
RJ Evans Flat Roofing Ltd is a UK-wide commercial roofing contractor delivering engineered roofing systems for commercial and industrial buildings nationwide. They design, install, inspect, maintain, and repair commercial roofing systems for various commercial building types across the UK.
Key services
Commercial roofing installation, Commercial roof repairs, Roof inspections and surveys, Waterproofing systems, Asphalt roofing, GRP roofing, Liquid roofing systems, Gutter lining and cleaning, Basement tanking, Emergency roof repair
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, hCaptcha, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Font Awesome 5.6.3 and 4.3.0, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Merriweather, Open Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of hCaptcha for form protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with comprehensive content about commercial roofing services.
  2. Multiple contact methods and physical address provided.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including accreditations and customer testimonials.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for traffic analysis and marketing insights. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses hCaptcha for bot protection on forms. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in accessibility and security headers. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rjevansroofing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rjevansroofing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.