Skip to main content

Security report for rix.lv

RIX Sia · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RIX Sia is a Latvian logistics and transportation company specializing in land, air, and sea freight services along with warehousing solutions. The company targets businesses requiring efficient cargo transportation across Europe, positioning itself as a reliable regional logistics provider. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear information about services and contact details, supporting its market presence. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, integrating Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and moderately performant, though some accessibility and SEO improvements are possible. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enforced and reCAPTCHA is used on forms, but the absence of explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and hardening. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate business with standard privacy protection. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance and security headers would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rix.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rix.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rix.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RIX operates in the transportation sector, offering comprehensive logistics services including general cargo, combined loads, jumbo shipments, oversized and hazardous cargo, air and sea freight, and warehousing. The company serves a medium-sized market segment primarily in Latvia and Europe. Its business model focuses on integrated logistics solutions with value-added services. The website reflects a stable market position with clear service segmentation and a professional online presence. Partnerships are indicated through social media and local platforms like Draugiem.lv. The company emphasizes quality and efficiency, targeting business clients needing reliable freight solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA protects forms against automated abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy or security policies are published, which may impact GDPR compliance and user trust. There is no evidence of a published incident response plan or vulnerability disclosure program. The site uses third-party scripts which should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RIX Sia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RIX Sia
Description
Kravu pārvadājumi, transporta pakalpojumi. Kravu un loģistikas pakalpojumi - aviokravu, autokravu pārvadājumi, jūras kravu pārvadājumi, lielgabarīta un nestandarta kravu pārvadājumi.
Key services
Autotransports, Avio kravu pārvadājumi, Jūras kravu pārvadājumi, Noliktavas (Warehousing)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, DJ Image Slider, Joomla CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Joomla
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied by GTM), Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Latvian with multi-language support (German, English)
  3. Uses Joomla CMS with standard plugins and Google services
  4. Contact info is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on main page
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Draugiem.lv
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. No adult or NSFW content present
  10. Website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form security
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, leveraging Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA for UI and security. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates analytics integration. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with a moderate performance profile. However, no advanced performance optimization or modern frontend frameworks are detected. The technical stack is stable but could be modernized for improved speed and security. The lack of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rix.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rix.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.