Skip to main content

Security report for rijzemes.lv

SIA “Rijzemess” · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “Rijzemess” is a Latvian family-owned company specializing in forestry clearing and land maintenance services, operating for over 10 years primarily in the Kurzeme region. Their key offerings include shrub and tree clearing, material transportation, wood chipping, excavation, bulk cargo, and trailer services. The company targets both private individuals and businesses, positioning itself as a reliable regional service provider with modern equipment and professional service. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and includes clear contact information and social media presence, reflecting a mature digital footprint. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though security headers are missing and no explicit privacy policy page was found. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy and security standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rijzemes.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rijzemes.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rijzemes.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and energy sectors, focusing on forestry and land clearing services. Its business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through specialized clearing, transportation, and material processing services. The company leverages modern equipment and over a decade of experience to serve a regional market. The presence of social media accounts and a professional website indicates active marketing efforts. The lack of detailed WHOIS registrant organization data is a minor gap but does not detract from the business credibility given the consistent contact details and registration number displayed. Growth potential exists in expanding service offerings or geographic reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form, reducing spam and abuse risk. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy page. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but could be improved with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security policy or incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Rijzemess”
Registration number
41203035148
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Rijzemess”
Description
SIA “Rijzemess” is a family-owned company specializing in forestry clearing and land maintenance services, operating for over 10 years mainly in the Kurzeme region of Latvia. They provide professional clearing of overgrown areas and produce high-quality heating materials sustainably. They serve both private individuals and businesses.
Key services
Shrub and tree clearing, Material transportation (forwarder services), Wood chipping, Excavator services, Bulk cargo transportation, Trailer services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7 plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v3, FooBox Image Lightbox, Cookie Notice plugin, Handyman Blocks theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on forestry and land clearing services in Latvia.
  3. Contact information is clear and consistent across header, footer, and contact form.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  6. Security headers are missing or not detected.
  7. Uses modern WordPress version and common plugins.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  10. No explicit or adult content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using a modern theme (Handyman Blocks) and common plugins such as Contact Form 7, FooBox Lightbox, and Cookie Notice. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site loads moderate-sized images and scripts, resulting in moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA landmarks and enhanced keyboard navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website with room for performance and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rijzemes.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rijzemes.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.