Skip to main content

Security report for rigatransfer.com

Taxi Call Center SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rigatransfer.com is a well-established taxi and transfer service provider based in Riga, Latvia, operating since 2011. The company offers a range of transportation services including private, business, economy, premium, intercity, and international taxi transfers. Their target audience includes travelers, tourists, and business clients seeking reliable and comfortable transportation within Latvia and to neighboring countries. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and integrates customer reviews and trust signals such as Tripadvisor ratings. Technically, the site uses a custom-built platform with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, there are gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices, notably the absence of privacy and cookie policies and missing security headers. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigatransfer.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reliable and affordable taxi transfer service in Riga and Latvia, emphasizing convenience, transparent pricing, and professional drivers. Their business model revolves around online bookings supported by 24/7 customer service. The presence of multiple vehicle classes and international transfer options indicates a diversified service offering. The integration of customer reviews and social media presence enhances credibility. The company appears to be a small-sized local business with a focused market niche in transportation. Partnerships with local SEO and update service providers are evident. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy, which could hinder effective security incident management. The forms include GDPR consent checkboxes, indicating some level of data protection awareness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts without explicit cookie consent mechanisms may pose privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Review and optimize third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and consider implementing a cookie consent banner.
  5. Regularly audit website security and privacy compliance to maintain a strong security posture and regulatory adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Taxi Call Center SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Taxi Call Center SIA
Description
Rigatransfer.com provides safe, efficient, and affordable taxi and transfer services across Latvia including airport, station, ferry terminal, railway station, and hotel transfers. They offer economy, standard, premium, and business class vehicles with amenities such as air conditioning, Wi-Fi, and child seats on request.
Key services
Private Transfer, Business Transfer, Economy Transfer, Premium Transfer, Intercity Taxi, International Taxi Transfers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, Custom JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • GDPR consent checkbox on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Rambler's Top100, Top.LV
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Tripadvisor Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive taxi transfer services in Riga and Latvia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Multiple language options available (English, Latvian, Russian).
  5. Use of multiple analytics and tracking services without explicit cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No visible security headers or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Good integration of customer reviews and trust signals.
  8. Modern UI with responsive design and multimedia content.
  9. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom platform leveraging popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and jQuery UI, with integration of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Yandex Metrika for analytics. The site uses FontAwesome for icons and Slick Carousel for UI elements. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags and structured data using schema.org for taxi services. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain is registered with 1API GmbH. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. There is no CMS detected, indicating a bespoke development approach. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigatransfer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigatransfer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.