Skip to main content

Security report for rigastilti.lv

Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Rīgas tilti" · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Rīgas tilti" is a Latvian company specializing in infrastructure construction and maintenance, including bridges, tunnels, quays, tramway tracks, and related services. They also provide specialized building materials sales, transport and equipment rental, and hospitality services through Hotel Vantis. The company appears to be a medium-sized, established local player serving business and public sector clients in Riga. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, supporting their business credibility. Technically, the site uses a Django backend, jQuery, and Matomo analytics, with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with no adult or questionable content detected. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Strategic improvements include publishing privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and improving accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigastilti.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and construction sectors, focusing on infrastructure projects in Riga, Latvia. Their diversified services include construction, maintenance, materials sales, transport logistics, and hospitality, indicating multiple revenue streams. The presence of a certifications page and detailed contact info suggests a professional and credible market position. The use of Matomo analytics reflects a privacy-conscious approach. No social media presence was detected, which may limit digital marketing reach. The company targets municipal and commercial clients requiring infrastructure services. Growth potential exists through expanded digital presence and enhanced compliance. Partnerships with ka2.lv for website development are evident. No suspicious or unrelated domains were found linked to the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens protect form submissions, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency. The cookie consent banner supports GDPR compliance but the absence of a privacy policy is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a medium-sized business but could be improved by adopting best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Expand digital presence by adding verified social media profiles and improving SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Rīgas tilti"
Registration number
40003033272
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Rīgas tilti"
Description
Company engaged in bridge, traffic overpass, tunnel and quay construction and reconstruction; daily maintenance and repair of these structures; specialized building materials sales; tramway track construction; production of nonstandard reinforced concrete constructions; route coordination for oversized and heavy cargo transport in Riga; transport services and construction equipment rental; hotel services via Hotel Vantis.
Key services
Bridge and infrastructure construction and reconstruction, Maintenance and repair of bridges and quays, Specialized building materials sales, Tramway track construction, Nonstandard reinforced concrete production, Route coordination for oversized cargo, Transport and construction equipment rental, Hotel services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Matomo Analytics, CSS (minified), JavaScript (minified)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)
  • CSRF token in language selection form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and includes CSRF protection on forms.
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Contact information is comprehensive and detailed.
  7. Business information is clearly presented with registration number and legal address.
  8. Use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy-conscious tracking.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Django framework backend, indicated by the CSRF token and language selection form action. Frontend technologies include jQuery 2.2.4 and minified CSS and JavaScript files. Matomo analytics is used for user tracking with both JavaScript and image pixel methods, reflecting a privacy-aware approach. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no obvious broken elements. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern security headers and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigastilti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigastilti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.