Skip to main content

Security report for rigapartybus.eu

Riga Party Bus · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riga Party Bus is a small transportation service provider based in Latvia, specializing in party bus rentals for group events such as stag and hen parties, airport transfers, and sightseeing tours. The company has established a solid market position in Riga with a focus on providing a fun and stylish party experience on wheels, including onboard drinks and adult entertainment options. The website is professionally designed with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, it employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Maps integration, and analytics tools, ensuring a functional and engaging user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive GDPR-aligned policies embedded directly on the site. Overall, the business demonstrates credibility with multiple contact channels and trust indicators such as customer reviews and social media presence. The content is mature-themed due to alcohol and adult entertainment offerings, targeting a mature audience. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigapartybus.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rigapartybus.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rigapartybus.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector with a niche focus on party and event transportation in Riga. Its business model revolves around direct service provision with optional add-ons like beverages and entertainment, generating revenue from group bookings. The target market includes tourists and locals organizing celebrations, with a strong emphasis on stag and hen parties. The company leverages partnerships with local event providers and maintains an active social media presence to enhance market reach. The website's integration of booking forms and payment options indicates a streamlined customer acquisition process. The business has been operational since 2011, indicating stability and experience in the market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML source. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could improve defense against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be a gap in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good for a small business website but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact information for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and provide clearer user controls for privacy preferences.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riga Party Bus
Description
Riga Party Bus offers party bus services in Riga with drinks and onboard entertainment, targeting stag parties, hen parties, group weekends, airport transfers, and sightseeing.
Key services
Party bus hire, Airport transfers, Onboard drinks and entertainment, Event hosting for stag and hen parties, Sightseeing tours
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Tippy.js, Masked Input plugin, Google Tag Manager, Roistat analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection
  • HTTPS usage
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment options indicated

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Roistat
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Roistat
Marketing tools
Roistat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Business is clearly presented with comprehensive terms and privacy policies.
  3. Multiple contact methods are provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with additional headers and explicit security policies.
  6. Content includes adult-themed entertainment and alcohol, targeting mature audiences.
  7. Social media presence is established primarily on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Tippy.js, and Google Maps API to deliver interactive and dynamic content. Google Tag Manager and Roistat analytics are integrated for marketing and performance tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes client-side form validation and masked input for phone numbers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times by optimizing scripts and images. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the domain registrar is joker.com, a reputable registrar. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigapartybus.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigapartybus.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.