Skip to main content

Security report for riciba.lv

Retail · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

57/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riciba.lv is an e-commerce website focused on retailing flooring products such as parquet, linoleum, laminate, doors, and floor coverings primarily targeting the Latvian market. The website uses the OpenCart CMS platform with the Journal3 theme and incorporates modern frontend libraries like Bootstrap and Font Awesome, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a generally good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, limits its compliance and business credibility. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or vulnerability disclosures, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, reducing trust assessment capabilities. Overall, the site appears functional and legitimate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security improvements.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riciba.lv

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
Average
57

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector specializing in home improvement and flooring products, targeting local Latvian customers. The business model is e-commerce with a product catalog and online shopping capabilities. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or extensive business information on the site. The company appears to be small-sized with a focus on direct consumer sales. The lack of detailed business data and contact information suggests a limited digital footprint and potential opportunity for growth in transparency and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from base href using https), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Obtain and display relevant business certifications or trust seals to enhance market position and customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Riciba
Key services
parkets, linolejs, lamināts, durvis, grīdas segumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, MasterSlider, Swiper, Journal3 theme, OpenCart
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
OpenCart
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses OpenCart CMS with Journal3 theme and common frontend libraries.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links or business certifications found.
  8. Website content is in Latvian language targeting local retail customers.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the OpenCart CMS platform using the Journal3 theme, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes MasterSlider and Swiper libraries for interactive UI components. The site is mobile optimized with responsive layouts and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators found. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no structured data such as JSON-LD detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium e-commerce sites but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riciba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riciba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.