Skip to main content

Security report for richardgreener.co.uk

Richard Greener Estate Agents · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Richard Greener Estate Agents is a small, specialized real estate agency focused on property sales, lettings, and auctions in Northamptonshire, UK. The company offers a range of services including valuations, development land planning, and premium property listings, positioning itself as a local market expert. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as the Homeflow platform, Google Analytics, and Vimeo for video content. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram supports their marketing efforts. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some important security headers and a robust Content-Security-Policy. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rule violations, which raises some legitimacy concerns despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and well-targeted to its audience, but could improve security and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching richardgreener.co.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate sector, targeting buyers, sellers, landlords, tenants, and developers in Northamptonshire. Its business model revolves around property transactions and auctions, supplemented by valuation services and development consultancy. The company leverages partnerships with auction houses and provides instant valuation tools via subdomains. The website content and navigation are clear and professional, supporting customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers in the visible content suggests reliance on contact forms and social media channels. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and demonstrates moderate digital maturity with integrated analytics and marketing tools.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms with GDPR compliance indicators. However, it lacks several key security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, and the Content-Security-Policy header is empty, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Vimeo introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  2. Add essential security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS domain registration issues to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Richard Greener Estate Agents
Description
Northamptonshire property and auction specialists, offering services in buying, selling and letting houses, auctions and development land and planning.
Key services
Property sales, Property lettings, Auctions, Valuations, Development land and planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vimeo Player, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Homeflow platform
Frameworks
Homeflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Spam protection and reCAPTCHA enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
LeadPro widget, Elfsight Number Counter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to real estate services in Northamptonshire.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanism and links to a cookie policy page.
  5. No visible email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram links.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Homeflow platform, utilizing JavaScript frameworks and libraries including React components (e.g., react-datepicker) and Vimeo for video content. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and script management. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with richardgreener.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review richardgreener.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.