Skip to main content

Security report for rias.lv

SIA RIAS · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA RIAS is a Latvian company established in 1994 specializing in equipment rental, material delivery, construction, and installation of biological treatment systems. The company targets both business and individual customers in the construction and transportation sectors within Latvia. Their website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and relevant business content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, which limits full trust assessment. Overall, the company presents as a legitimate small business with a professional online presence but could improve privacy and security compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rias.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and construction sectors, offering equipment rental (dump trucks, excavators), material delivery (sand, soil, gravel), and construction services (roads, ponds, earthworks). It maintains partnerships with several local companies, enhancing its market position. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on local clients. The website content and contact information are comprehensive, supporting credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited social media presence suggest room for growth in digital marketing and compliance. The company appears stable with a consistent brand and a small-sized operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits reduces the ability to verify domain legitimacy fully. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a security policy and vulnerability disclosure process to demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS data or ensure domain registration details are transparent to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA RIAS
Registration number
40103112973
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA RIAS
Description
SIA RIAS dibināts 1994. gadā. Uzņēmums nodarbojas ar tehnikas nomas, materiālu piegādes, būvniecības un bioloģisko attīrīšanas iekārtu uzstādīšanas pakalpojumiem. Pieredzējuši šoferi, tehnikas operatori un būvinženieri nodrošina augstu pakalpojuma kvalitāti.
Key services
Pašizgāzēju noma, Ekskavatoru noma, Materiālu piegāde (smilts, melnzeme, šķembas, oļi, grunts), Būvniecība (ielas, laukumi, grāvji, dīķi), Bioloģiskās attīrīšanas iekārtu uzstādīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.30.0, Yoast SEO 25.4, jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome 5.5.0, Swiper.js, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Business information is clearly presented and consistent.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  5. Security headers are minimal; HTTPS is present.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly labeled.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS platform. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome for UI elements, and Swiper.js for image carousels. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rias.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rias.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.