Skip to main content

Security report for rhema.at

Rhema Gemeinde · Non-profit · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rhema Gemeinde is a small non-profit religious community based in Linz, Austria, focused on providing Christian church services, youth and children programs, and community events. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform for members and visitors, offering event details, livestream access, and contact options. The technical infrastructure is based on TYPO3 CMS with common web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted via easyname.eu. However, the site lacks HTTPS encryption, which is a critical security deficiency. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced security or incident response policies are evident. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rhema.at

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets local community members and visitors interested in Christian faith and fellowship. Its business model is non-profit and community-oriented, relying on events and services rather than commercial revenue. The site maintains a consistent brand and clear navigation, supporting engagement through social media channels and contact forms. The partnership with INFOUND for site design indicates professional support. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and improving security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of HSTS, and missing modern TLS protocols. Security headers are limited to basic protections like X-Content-Type-Options. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Forms collect personal data with privacy consent, but data protection officer contact or detailed policies are not found. The lack of cookie consent and security.txt reduces compliance with GDPR and best practices. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and security headers is recommended to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HSTS header with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  6. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to improve GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature CMS (TYPO3) with Bootstrap and common JavaScript libraries, indicating a standard modern web stack. Hosting is via easyname.eu, a reputable provider. However, performance data is missing, and the site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical and security shortcoming. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear. The site could benefit from performance optimization and accessibility improvements. No structured data or Open Graph metadata is present, limiting SEO potential. Overall, the technical foundation is solid but requires modernization in security and SEO aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rhema.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rhema.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.