Skip to main content

Security report for rhaldus.ee

R Haldus OÜ · Real Estate · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R Haldus OÜ is a small Estonian company specializing in property management services for commercial and residential real estate. Their website presents a focused business model offering competent and quality property maintenance and management services. The site is primarily in Estonian with options for English and Russian, targeting property owners seeking professional management solutions. Technically, the website is built on the Voog CMS platform and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Modernizr, along with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security matters. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with room for improvement in privacy, security, and content depth.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rhaldus.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on property management services. Its market positioning is that of a small, specialized firm emphasizing clear and concrete service delivery. The business model is service-based, targeting property owners who prefer outsourcing property maintenance and management. The website content and structure suggest a straightforward approach without extensive marketing or trust-building elements such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information on the site limits transparency. The company uses standard web analytics tools but does not disclose data protection or privacy practices, which could impact customer trust. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms are present, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal and reputational risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, which reduces the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The use of well-known libraries like jQuery and Modernizr is noted, but no vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website content with trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, and detailed company information.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R Haldus OÜ
Description
R Haldus OÜ pakub haldusteenust ärikinnisvara ja elamute korrashoiu korraldamiseks. Teenus hõlmab kinnisvara füüsilise, juriidilise, majandusliku ja sotsiaalse säilimise tagamist läbi kasutamisega seotud protsesside juhtimise.
Key services
Haldusteenus, Kinnisvara korrashoid, Konsultatsioonid
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Modernizr, Voog CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to an email and phone number in the footer.
  4. No forms detected on the site for data collection.
  5. Site uses Voog CMS platform with common JS libraries and Google Analytics.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No social media links found on the site.
  8. Content is primarily in Estonian with language switcher for English and Russian.
  9. Site content is basic and focused on real estate property management services.
  10. No certifications or security policies mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Voog CMS platform, utilizing jQuery, Modernizr, and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from Voog's CDN and trusted sources like Cloudflare and Google. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Mobile optimization is good with responsive images and layout. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or backend technologies. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization techniques detected. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. The site lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are critical technical risks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rhaldus.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rhaldus.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.