Skip to main content

Security report for rezeknespartneriba.lv

Biedriba "Rezeknes novada partneriba" · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedriba "Rezeknes novada partneriba" is a Latvian non-profit organization focused on regional partnership and development within the Rezekne municipality. The website serves as an informational platform for local stakeholders and community members. The business model is typical for a small non-profit entity, targeting local audiences with partnership and community engagement activities. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with standard web technologies and common libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome. The site is accessible and mobile-optimized but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic, with no detected security headers or privacy policies, which presents compliance and risk gaps. The WHOIS data is partially consistent with the business identity but lacks registrar and creation date details, limiting full trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and richer content to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rezeknespartneriba.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on regional partnership in Latvia. Its market position is local and community-oriented, with no evident commercial services or revenue streams on the website. The lack of detailed service descriptions or certifications suggests a modest operational scale. The website does not reveal partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a standalone entity. The business intelligence points to a small-sized organization with a straightforward mission. Growth indicators or competitive advantages are not discernible from the website content. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, limiting insights into strategic collaborations.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic and lacks several best practices. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options increases exposure to common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could delay response to security incidents. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external resource URLs), but SSL configuration details are unavailable. No privacy or cookie policies are present, raising GDPR compliance concerns. The lack of analytics or tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers to protect against common web attacks and improve security posture.
  3. Include clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedriba "Rezeknes novada partneriba"
Registration number
40008122543
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedriba "Rezeknes novada partneriba"
Description
A Latvian legal person entity likely focused on regional partnership activities in Rezekne municipality.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, FontAwesome, jQuery
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is incomplete but shows active status and Latvian registrant.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and common web fonts.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. Content is basic and focused on regional partnership activities.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It leverages common web technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a basic SEO setup with meta tags and RSS feeds. Performance is likely moderate given the use of standard plugins and themes without heavy customizations. Accessibility features are minimal, and no advanced technical frameworks or hosting details are evident. The lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest some technical debt and potential risks. Modernization opportunities include implementing security best practices, improving accessibility, and enriching metadata for better search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rezeknespartneriba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rezeknespartneriba.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.