Skip to main content

Security report for retailtouchpoints.com

Retail TouchPoints · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Retail TouchPoints is a specialized media platform delivering retail news, industry trends, and business insights targeted at retail executives and professionals. The website provides comprehensive coverage on customer experience, store operations, machine learning, and digital commerce, positioning itself as a valuable resource in the retail sector. The business model is centered on media and information services, leveraging content to engage a professional audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and enhanced by SEO tools such as Yoast SEO. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including Google Analytics, HubSpot, and Marketo, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and employs cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, uses reCAPTCHA on forms, and implements cookie consent banners. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and business credibility. Overall, Retail TouchPoints presents a professional and content-rich platform with good technical and security foundations but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security governance to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of retailtouchpoints.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retailtouchpoints.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Retail TouchPoints operates as a media and information service provider in the retail industry, targeting retail executives and professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in delivering specialized content on retail trends, customer experience, and emerging technologies like machine learning. Revenue streams likely include advertising and sponsored content, supported by extensive use of marketing tools. The company maintains an active social media presence and employs advanced analytics to optimize engagement. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and integration of modern digital marketing platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes major analytics and marketing service providers, though no direct business partner domains were identified. Strategic observations suggest a focus on content quality and digital maturity to maintain market relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, standard security headers, and use of CAPTCHA to protect forms. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but could be enhanced with explicit data retention policies and DPO contact information. The security culture appears focused on baseline protections but would benefit from formalized governance and incident readiness documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Retail TouchPoints
Description
Retail news, industry trends, business news and reports for retail executives covering customer experience, store operations, machine learning, digital commerce - Retail TouchPoints
Key services
Retail news, Industry trends, Business reports, Customer experience insights, Store operations analysis, Machine learning and digital commerce coverage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Amazon Polly, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Parsely
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Parsely, Marketo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Marketo
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional retail industry news portal
  2. Uses modern CMS and SEO tools
  3. Implements cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. No WHOIS data available, raising legitimacy concerns
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Marketo, Amazon Polly, and OneTrust for cookie consent. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details were not identified. The site uses standard ad serving via Google Ad Manager and includes extensive tracking and marketing scripts, which should be regularly audited for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retailtouchpoints.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retailtouchpoints.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.