Respectzone is a French non-profit organization dedicated to promoting respect and combating online violence, harassment, and hate. The organization provides educational interventions, legal aid, digital tools such as an app and MOOC, and awareness campaigns targeting schools, universities, social centers, local authorities, and companies. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and actively maintained with clear navigation and calls to action including donation options. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, uses HTTPS with good security headers, and implements privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. No critical security vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which is common and justified for non-profit entities. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, good privacy compliance, and high business credibility.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention respectzone.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for respectzone.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Respectzone occupies a niche in the non-profit sector focused on digital respect and anti-cyberharassment education. Its business model relies on educational programs, legal support, digital tools, and community engagement. The organization leverages partnerships with platforms like HelloAsso for donations and external MOOC providers for training. The target audience is broad, including educational institutions and public entities. The website content and structure indicate a stable and credible presence with consistent branding and active social media channels. Growth potential lies in expanding digital tools and awareness campaigns. No direct revenue streams are visible beyond donations and grants. The organization maintains transparency through legal mentions and privacy policies.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers such as HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy, enhancing protection against common web attacks. Forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could improve transparency and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of up-to-date WordPress plugins and themes is recommended to maintain security. Overall, the security posture is good for a non-profit website but could be enhanced with formal policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Respectzone
Description
Respectzone is a non-profit organization focused on promoting respect in digital spaces by providing tools and actions to prevent and react to online violence, harassment, and hate.
Key services
Interventions and training on digital respect and anti-cyberharassment, Legal aid and support services, Digital tools like RespectZone app and MOOC for moderation, Awareness campaigns and publications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Revolution Slider, WPML (multilingual), Contact Form 7, Mailjet, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
Cookie consent banner implemented
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Mailjet
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in French
No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
WHOIS data unavailable due to query failure or privacy protection
Strong focus on anti-cyberharassment and digital respect education
Multiple social media channels actively linked
Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies
Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and compliant
No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS using a variety of plugins including Revolution Slider, WPML for multilingual support, Contact Form 7, Mailjet for newsletters, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The front-end uses jQuery and modern CSS with responsive design ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some heavy slider assets but overall acceptable load times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is mature and stable, suitable for the organization's needs, with opportunities for modernization and performance optimization.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with respectzone.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review respectzone.org.