Security report for resonate.com
Resonate Networks, Inc. · Technology · United States
Resonate Networks, Inc. is a medium-sized technology company founded in 2008 and headquartered in Reston, Virginia, specializing in AI-powered consumer data and intelligence solutions. Their proprietary AI system, rAI, enables marketers and agencies to optimize customer lifecycle management through predictive consumer insights, data enrichment, and audience activation. The company positions itself as a leader in delivering hyper-relevant, dynamic consumer data at scale across multiple industries including finance, retail, media, and technology. Their business model revolves around SaaS platform offerings combined with managed media services, targeting marketers, agencies, political and advocacy groups. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Foundation CSS, and various marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive metadata, Open Graph tags, and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses multiple security and analytics scripts. While explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy are not explicitly detected, no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Forms are implemented using Gravity Forms with validation and spam prevention mechanisms. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the company's business claims. The domain registration details are consistent with the company information, supporting legitimacy. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
- CWE-1021
- OWASP A06:2025
- CAPEC-103
- ASVS V3.4.6
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends X-Frame-Options: deny
- RFC 7034
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching resonate.com
This scan found 4 issues across 1 check. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- Security headers
- 55
- Average
- 55
Not counted
- SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
- Email security: did not complete in this scan.
- DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
- Network security: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as X-Frame-Options, Content-Security-Policy, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
- Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and preparedness.
- Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
- Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and robust validation to prevent injection and abuse.
- Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Resonate Networks, Inc.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Resonate Networks, Inc.
- Description
- Resonate is the only consumer data and intelligence company that creates hyper-relevant, dynamic consumer insights and puts it at the fingertips of marketers for personalized brand action, scaled to the entire U.S. population. Their goal is to power a more personalized world with unparalleled consumer data, intelligence, and technology.
- Key services
- Consumer and market data, First-party data enrichment, Audience activation, Segmentation and persona development, Predictive modeling, Model optimization, Website personalization, Analytics and managed media services
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Foundation CSS, Motion UI, Owl Carousel, Gravity Forms, Vidyard video player, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, AdRoll, PathFactory, SalesLoft, Reddit Ads Pixel, CookieYes
- Frameworks
- Foundation
- Platforms
- WordPress
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of security and analytics scripts
- No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML
- Use of CAPTCHA and spam prevention in forms (Gravity Forms)
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Resonate Analytics
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- AdRoll, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Reddit Pixel
- Marketing tools
- PathFactory, SalesLoft, Pardot, Hellobar, MobileMonkey
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is professionally designed with rich content and clear navigation.
- Strong presence of AI-powered consumer data and marketing solutions.
- Multiple client testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
- Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
- Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools indicates mature digital marketing practices.
- No signs of blocking or WAF interference; full content accessible.
- Security posture is good but could improve with explicit security headers and published security policies.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
- 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with resonate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review resonate.com.