Skip to main content

Security report for report-antisemitism.de

Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Report Antisemitism is a specialized informational platform dedicated to reporting and educating about antisemitic incidents in Germany. The website serves a niche audience including victims, witnesses, researchers, and policymakers. It operates as a non-commercial entity focused on awareness and data collection rather than commercial services. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Gatsby stack, hosted by Hetzner, a reputable German hosting provider. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Security measures include HTTPS and a Content Security Policy in report-only mode, but lack enforcement and additional security headers. No privacy or cookie policies were detected, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or explicit content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of report-antisemitism.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching report-antisemitism.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention report-antisemitism.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for report-antisemitism.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the non-profit sector focused on antisemitism reporting in Germany. It provides key services such as incident reporting, data/statistics, and educational resources. The business model is informational and community-focused without commercial transactions. The website branding is consistent and content quality is good, supporting trustworthiness. Hosting on Hetzner aligns with the German focus. No explicit business registration or contact details were found, which is typical for non-profit informational sites. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a Content Security Policy in report-only mode, which is a positive security practice but should be enforced for better protection. Other security headers are missing, and no advanced security frameworks or incident response policies were found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security posture is moderate but could be improved by enforcing CSP, adding additional headers, and implementing privacy policies. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility.

Recommendations

  1. Enforce the Content Security Policy rather than using report-only mode to enhance protection against XSS and other attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Implement contact information and incident response details to improve transparency and user support.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Report Antisemitism is a website focused on reporting antisemitic incidents in Germany. It appears to be an informational and reporting platform rather than a commercial business.
Key services
Incident reporting, Data and statistics on antisemitism, Educational resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Content Security Policy (CSP) in report-only mode
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. No social media links detected in the truncated HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern React/Gatsby stack hosted on Hetzner servers.
  6. Content is focused on antisemitism reporting and education, targeting a general audience.
  7. Security headers are minimal but include a report-only CSP.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Gatsby, indicating a modern static site generation approach. Hosting is provided by Hetzner, a reputable German hosting provider. The site uses inline CSS and JavaScript with some hashed script integrity. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO meta tags are included but could be enhanced with Open Graph and structured data for better indexing. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which aligns with privacy-conscious design. The site lacks a CMS and appears to be a static or JAMstack site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with report-antisemitism.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review report-antisemitism.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.