Skip to main content

Security report for repjegykiraly.hu

pelicantravel.com s.r.o. · Transportation · Hungary

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Repjegykirály.hu is a Hungarian travel deals and tips website operated by pelicantravel.com s.r.o., established in 2016. The site focuses on providing affordable flight tickets, travel stories, and tips primarily targeting Hungarian-speaking travelers. It leverages affiliate marketing models integrated with Pelikan's flight booking services. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Ads, Exponea, and Crisp Chat. It features a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service on the main site. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports user engagement. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with structured data markup.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching repjegykiraly.hu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a niche travel deals provider in Hungary, focusing on budget-conscious travelers seeking flight discounts and travel advice. Its revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions from flight bookings and advertising via Google Ads and AdSense. The partnership ecosystem includes pelikan.hu and pelipecky.sk, which are closely related affiliate or partner sites. The company maintains consistent branding and content quality, with a focus on travel-related content and promotions. Growth indicators include regular content updates and integration of a mobile app via Pelikan. The business model is content-driven affiliate marketing with a focus on user engagement through social media and newsletters.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could improve security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer contact information such as official company emails or phone numbers to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
pelicantravel.com s.r.o.
Description
Olcsó repülőjegyek és utazási tippek. Utazási történetek, kirándulási tippek és tanácsok, hihetetlen különleges ajánlatokkal együtt. A legolcsóbb repjegyek és nyaralások egy helyen.
Key services
Flight ticket deals, Travel tips and stories, Affiliate flight booking integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Google AdSense, Crisp Chat, PushAlert, Exponea Analytics, Pelikan affiliate flight widget, Heroic FAQs plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Exponea Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Exponea Analytics, Crisp Chat, PushAlert
Marketing tools
Exponea, PushAlert
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Hungarian travel deals and tips portal focused on affordable flight tickets.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  3. Has cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or footer.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via social media and forms.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Website performance is moderate with good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-integrated tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and affiliate flight booking widgets. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization through structured data and meta tags. The site uses multiple caching and minification techniques (Breeze plugin) to optimize load times. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses CDN resources for fonts and images. The technical infrastructure supports the business model effectively but should focus on security header implementation and privacy documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with repjegykiraly.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review repjegykiraly.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.