Skip to main content

Security report for rentinriga.lv

Rent In Riga · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RentInRiga.lv is a Latvian real estate platform specializing in rental, sale, and investment properties primarily in Riga and surrounding regions. The website offers a comprehensive property database with over 1250 listings including apartments, houses, offices, warehouses, and commercial spaces. The platform targets individuals and businesses seeking real estate solutions in Latvia, providing detailed search filters and property categories to facilitate user navigation and decision-making. The business model centers on online brokerage and property listing services, positioning itself as a key local player in the real estate market. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Select2, Flickity, Google Maps API, Bing Maps API, Leaflet, and various analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site is mobile-optimized with good user experience and navigation clarity. However, some accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in SEO and performance optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies reduce the overall security and compliance maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information suggest legitimacy. Overall, RentInRiga.lv presents a professional and functional real estate platform with moderate technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rentinriga.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rentinriga.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rentinriga.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RentInRiga.lv operates in the Latvian real estate sector, focusing on property rentals, sales, and investment opportunities. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive property database and detailed search capabilities tailored to local market needs. Revenue streams likely include brokerage fees, listing services, and possibly advertising. The target customers are local residents, investors, and businesses seeking real estate in Riga and Latvia. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including social media engagement and uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to drive growth. The absence of detailed corporate data and WHOIS information limits deeper insights into ownership and financial scale, but the site’s content quality and service breadth indicate a medium-sized enterprise with established market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, indicating limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party tracking and analytics services without visible privacy disclosures raises compliance concerns under GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but would benefit from enhanced header configurations, privacy policy publication, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and user trust.
  4. Review and optimize accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize unnecessary data collection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rent In Riga
Description
Nekustamo īpašumu - dzīvokļu, māju, biroju, tirdzniecības telpu, noliktavu telpu, investīciju objektu īre, noma un tirdzniecība
Key services
Property rental, Property sales, Investment property listings, Property search and matching, Real estate consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Select2, Flickity, Google Maps API, Bing Maps API, Leaflet, MarkerCluster, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone
  4. Use of multiple tracking and analytics tools without visible privacy disclosures
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and APIs for maps and UI
  7. Good mobile responsiveness and user interface design
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and APIs to deliver a rich user experience, including jQuery UI for UI components, Select2 for enhanced select boxes, Flickity for carousels, and mapping APIs from Google and Bing alongside Leaflet for interactive maps. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user behavior tracking and marketing optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and content relevance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and privacy to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rentinriga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rentinriga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.