Skip to main content

Security report for renoairport.com

Reno-Tahoe International Airport · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reno-Tahoe International Airport operates as a regional airport authority serving the Reno-Tahoe region with a focus on passenger transportation, flight services, parking, and airport amenities. The website reflects a well-established entity with a strong market position, offering over 130 daily flights and 20+ nonstop destinations through 11 airlines. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and user experience across devices. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and standard best practices, though some security headers could be more explicitly implemented. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the professional presentation and trustworthiness of the site. Overall, the airport authority demonstrates a mature digital presence with good compliance and user engagement features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renoairport.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The airport authority holds an essential role in regional transportation, leveraging partnerships with multiple airlines and providing comprehensive passenger services. Its business model centers on facilitating air travel and related services, supported by a medium-sized organizational structure. The website targets passengers, local businesses, employees, and the community, reflecting a broad stakeholder engagement. Marketing and analytics tools indicate active efforts to optimize user experience and outreach. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact forms and social media engagement. The airport's growth is supported by continuous updates and news, indicating a dynamic operational environment.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present in the HTML, which could be improved. The presence of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could enhance its security documentation and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  4. Consider adding explicit company contact emails and phone numbers for improved user trust and support.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reno-Tahoe International Airport
Description
Visit the people & places you love. Information on arrivals, departures, dining, shopping, lounge access, parking & more at the Reno-Tahoe International Airport.
Key services
Flight information, Parking and transportation, Airport amenities, Customer experience, Business and community engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot Forms, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Google Translate
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (HubSpot, Yoast)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Adentifi
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a public airport domain.
  4. Site uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is available via contact form but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  7. Multiple social media profiles linked and active.
  8. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented.
  9. Advertising and tracking scripts are present but standard for such a site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO, HubSpot forms, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager integrations, reflecting a modern and well-maintained technical stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses Google Translate for multilingual support and employs Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form security. Hosting details are not explicit, but the presence of Cloudflare-like scripts is not detected, indicating direct hosting or other CDN usage. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renoairport.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renoairport.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.