Skip to main content

Security report for remonte.com

Rieker Holding AG · Retail · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rieker Holding AG operates the remonte brand, a traditional women's footwear brand established in 1876, known for combining fashionable style with comfort. The website showcases the brand's commitment to quality, design, and comfort technologies, targeting fashion-conscious women. The digital infrastructure is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern web technologies and integrates comprehensive analytics and advertising tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain is typical and does not detract from the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website reflects a mature, professional retail brand with good privacy compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remonte.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The remonte brand is positioned as a high-quality, comfort-focused women's shoe brand under Rieker Holding AG. The business model centers on retail and brand manufacturing with a strong emphasis on comfort features and style. The company leverages partnerships with multiple advertising and analytics platforms to optimize marketing efforts. The presence of a Code of Conduct and privacy policies indicates a commitment to corporate responsibility and compliance. The brand targets a niche of fashion-conscious women seeking comfort, supported by a large, established parent company. The website's multilingual support and dealer locator enhance market reach and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a detailed cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising services are used, with clear cookie categorization and user consent options. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers are partially present or implied but could be explicitly enforced for enhanced protection. The site lacks a public security policy or incident response contact, which could be improved to bolster trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good for a retail brand website but can benefit from additional explicit security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are used.
  4. Enhance form security by ensuring CSRF tokens and input validation are in place for all user input forms.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and user expectations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rieker Holding AG
Description
remonte is a traditional women's shoe brand established in 1876, focusing on fashionable style combined with comfort. The brand offers shoes with comfort features like replaceable insoles, super light outsoles, and wider sizes up to 45. It is part of the Rieker group and targets fashion-conscious women seeking comfortable, high-quality footwear.
Key services
Women's footwear collections, Comfort shoe technologies, Dealer and store locator services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Bootstrap Icons, Streamline Icons
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie classification
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, TikTok, Microsoft Advertising, Facebook Ads, Snapchat Ads, Pinterest Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Snapchat Pixel, Pinterest Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  3. Strong branding and consistent design aligned with a traditional footwear brand.
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising services with clear cookie categorization.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, but this is typical for subdomains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It uses modern web standards including responsive images, preloading fonts, and asynchronous script loading for performance optimization. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot shows advanced analytics and privacy management capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for further optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable e-commerce presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remonte.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remonte.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.