Skip to main content

Security report for relyonshipping.com

Relyon Shipping Ltd. · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Relyon Shipping Ltd. is a Latvia-based logistics company established in 2012, specializing in container logistics, air freight, road transport, vessel chartering, and cargo handling services. The company serves the Baltic region and neighboring countries, leveraging membership in the Global Affinity Alliance to provide flexible global transport solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted on Closte, and integrates Google Maps, Google Analytics, and Drift Chat for enhanced user engagement and tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, with no visible cookie consent or GDPR-specific mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional, moderately optimized, and credible, supporting the company's business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching relyonshipping.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention relyonshipping.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for relyonshipping.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a fast-growing regional logistics provider with a focus on cost-efficient and complex transport solutions. Their business model centers on freight forwarding and logistics services targeting businesses in the Baltics and Eastern Europe. The presence of a dedicated call center, working hours, and physical office address supports operational transparency. The partnership with Global Affinity Alliance enhances their market reach. The website's content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a professional approach and moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard domain registration practices, indicating a baseline security level. However, the absence of DNSSEC and key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which may impact trust for security-conscious clients. The use of third-party analytics and chat tools introduces moderate tracking but no overt privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies to build trust with clients.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Relyon Shipping Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Relyon Shipping Ltd.
Description
Established in 2012 Relyon Shipping Ltd. is a fast growing logistics company with a dedicated team of professionals in container logistics (FCL/LCL), air freight, road transport, vessel chartering, cargo packaging, handling and warehousing. Covering the Baltics (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia), Russia, Belarus and Ukraine providing cost efficient and easy transport solutions.
Key services
Container logistics (FCL/LCL), Air Freight, Road Transport, Vessel Chartering, Cargo packaging, handling and warehousing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Maps API, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Drift Chat
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Drift Chat
Marketing tools
Drift Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused on logistics and freight services.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  5. Security headers are minimal; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Drift Chat.
  7. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS hosted on Closte with Google Cloud DNS.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Google APIs. Hosting is via Closte with Google Cloud DNS. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, and Drift Chat. There is no evidence of critical technical debt or broken elements, but security-related technical enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with relyonshipping.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review relyonshipping.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.