Skip to main content

Security report for reklamasnams.lv

Reklamas Nams · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reklamas Nams is a Latvian-based company specializing in custom retail merchandising solutions, including visual merchandising displays, point of purchase displays, racks, stands, and related retail fixtures. Founded in 2006, the company has built a solid reputation working with prominent retail brands such as L'Oreal, COTY, CHANEL, and SHISEIDO. Their business model focuses on B2B manufacturing and technical design services, targeting retailers and brands seeking bespoke merchandising solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear presentation of services and portfolio.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reklamasnams.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reklamasnams.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reklamasnams.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an experienced niche player in the retail merchandising manufacturing sector, leveraging over 15 years of industry experience. Their competitive advantage lies in custom solutions and technical prototyping capabilities. The website highlights key services and showcases selected projects, indicating a focus on quality and client trust. The presence of Instagram as a social channel suggests engagement with visual marketing and client outreach. The business appears to be small-sized with a localized market focus in Latvia and possibly the broader European retail sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which indicates room for improvement in security best practices and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy compliance, and formal incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain secure operations.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response policy or security contact to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reklamas Nams
Description
Custom manufacturing of visual merchandising displays, point of purchase displays, racks and stands for retail products. Founded in 2006, offers custom retail merchandising solutions including retail display shelves, cabinets, light boxes, and retail fixtures. Experienced working with top retailers such as L'Oreal, COTY, CHANEL, SHISEIDO.
Key services
Visual merchandising materials, POS & POP material production, Promo podium elements production, Window decoration production, Product display cabinets, Shop fixtures, Technical design and prototyping, TV & Corporate studio building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Chatra live chat, Tilda Publishing platform scripts and CSS
Frameworks
Tilda CMS framework
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical and og:url
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Chatra live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. Contact primarily via form popup and Instagram link
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  5. Uses Tilda CMS platform with common marketing and analytics tools
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in HTML
  7. No visible email addresses or phone numbers with clear context
  8. No evidence of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and several asynchronous scripts for analytics and live chat functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with standard web technologies. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern enough for the business needs but could be improved with updated libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reklamasnams.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reklamasnams.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.