Skip to main content

Security report for regencyexectravel.co.uk

Regency Executive Travel · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Regency Executive Travel is a small, established chauffeur and executive car hire company based in Milton Keynes, UK, operating since 1986. They offer luxury chauffeur services, airport transfers, wedding cars, and special occasion transportation. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation and relevant content targeting individuals and businesses seeking premium transportation services in the region. Technically, the site uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager, with HTTPS enforced and security features like reCAPTCHA and cookie consent implemented. However, some outdated libraries and missing security headers suggest room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration errors, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and contact information appear credible. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security posture but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, updating libraries, and clarifying domain registration status to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regencyexectravel.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on luxury chauffeur and executive travel services in Milton Keynes. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting both individual and corporate clients who require high-quality, reliable transportation. The firm leverages its long-standing presence since 1986 as a competitive advantage, emphasizing personalized service and local expertise. Revenue streams likely include direct bookings for chauffeur services, airport transfers, and wedding car hires. The partnership with Amasci Creative Limited for website design and a dedicated payment subdomain indicates a modest but professional digital ecosystem. Growth potential exists through enhanced online marketing and expanding service offerings. The company maintains active social media profiles on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, supporting customer engagement and brand visibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions, demonstrating a baseline security maturity. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version could expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly managed. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a small business but with opportunities for enhancement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest stable versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Clarify domain registration status and resolve WHOIS inconsistencies to enhance trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Regency Executive Travel
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Regency Executive Travel
Description
Regency Executive Travel provides high class chauffeuring services including airport transfers and wedding cars in Milton Keynes and surrounding areas.
Key services
Chauffeur Service, Airport Transfers, Wedding Cars, Special Occasions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.2, jQuery UI 1.12.0, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), CookieConsent v3.0.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieConsent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern security practices like reCAPTCHA and cookie consent.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  5. Multiple service offerings are clearly described with good content quality.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. External links include social media and payment processing domains.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. Website uses older jQuery version but no known vulnerabilities detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack using jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components, Google Fonts for typography, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 to protect forms from spam and abuse. The site is mobile responsive with a viewport meta tag and uses cookie consent scripts to comply with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google-hosted libraries and CDNs. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including upgrading libraries, improving accessibility features, and optimizing load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regencyexectravel.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regencyexectravel.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.