Skip to main content

Security report for regatta.pl

Regatta PL · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Regatta PL is an established e-commerce retailer specializing in outdoor clothing and footwear, targeting families in Poland. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image emphasizing British quality products. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Vue.js, Bootstrap 5, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Exponea and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the apparent legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is a credible and professional retail platform with room for improvement in security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regatta.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Regatta PL operates in the retail sector focusing on outdoor apparel and footwear, serving a general audience including families. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with a strong emphasis on quality and brand reputation. The presence of related brand Dare2b suggests a partnership or brand portfolio strategy. The company uses advanced marketing tools and tracking to optimize customer engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS and company registration information limits full verification of business credentials. The website's design and content quality indicate a mature digital presence with potential for growth in the Polish market and possibly beyond.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could hinder transparency and trust. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements but no detailed privacy policy was found in the analyzed content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced headers, published policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or verify domain registration details to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Regatta PL
Description
Odzież i obuwie outdoor. Kurtki wodoodporne i narciarskie, polary i buty. Brytyjska jakość dla całej rodziny w sklepie Regatta i Dare2b.
Key services
Outdoor clothing sales, Footwear sales, Family apparel
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue Storefront, Bootstrap 5, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA, Exponea, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Exponea, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Exponea, CookieYes
Marketing tools
Exponea
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy or registration issues
  3. Professional e-commerce site for outdoor apparel
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  5. Cookie consent mechanism present
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info found
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  8. No contact phone numbers explicitly found, only email and contact form implied
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack centered on Vue.js and Bootstrap 5, ensuring responsive design and good accessibility. Integration with marketing and analytics platforms like Exponea and Google Tag Manager supports data-driven business decisions. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and fonts, indicating a rich user interface but potentially moderate performance. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless frontend approach. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of explicit security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for performance tuning and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regatta.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regatta.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.