Redzēt Debesis is a small Latvian business specializing in canoe rental services and guided river routes primarily around Pāvilosta and nearby regions. The website provides detailed descriptions of various canoe routes on rivers such as Tebra, Durbe, and Rīva, along with pricing and included services like boat and safety equipment rental and transport. The target audience includes families, nature lovers, and tourists seeking outdoor recreational activities. Technically, the website uses older but stable technologies such as Bootstrap 3.3.2, jQuery 1.11.2, and Leaflet for interactive maps, with integrations for Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media engagement. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured but lacks modern security headers and privacy policies. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing important security best practices like HTTPS enforcement and security headers. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate small local business. Overall, the site is functional and informative but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security measures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention redzetdebesis.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for redzetdebesis.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in the niche tourism and transportation sector, focusing on canoe rentals and river route experiences in Latvia. Its business model relies on direct rentals, route consulting, and transport services, targeting local and visiting outdoor enthusiasts. The website's clear contact details and social media presence support customer engagement, though the absence of formal privacy and terms policies may limit trust for privacy-conscious users. The use of dated web technologies indicates potential technical debt but does not critically impair functionality. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business appears stable but small-scale, with opportunities for growth through enhanced digital presence and compliance.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no forms collecting sensitive data, reducing attack surface. However, the lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are notable gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. Tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook SDK is present but without clear privacy disclosures, raising compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the website footer or menu.
Include security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities and improve browser security.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to enhance transparency.
Upgrade JavaScript libraries and frameworks to current supported versions to reduce technical debt and security risks.
Website is fully accessible with rich content about canoe rental routes and services.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
No forms detected on the site, reducing risk of data collection vulnerabilities.
Use of common and dated libraries (Bootstrap 3.3.2, jQuery 1.11.2) suggests some technical debt.
No explicit security headers detected in the HTML source.
Social media presence limited to Facebook pages embedded.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; registrant data unknown.
No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; site is accessible.
Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a classic web stack using Bootstrap 3.3.2 and jQuery 1.11.2, which are outdated but functional. Leaflet is used effectively for interactive maps, enhancing user experience. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, including maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and cdnjs.cloudflare.com. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and social media features. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, the absence of modern security headers and lack of HTTPS enforcement (not verifiable from provided data) are technical risks. The site does not use a CMS or modern frameworks, indicating a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by updating libraries and optimizing assets.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with redzetdebesis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redzetdebesis.lv.