Skip to main content

Security report for redwoodestates.co.uk

Redwood Estates · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redwood Estates operates as a small real estate agency focused on property sales and lettings within specific London areas such as Woolwich, Thamesmead, Plumstead, and Docklands. The website presents a professional front with clear business descriptions and targeted services for property buyers and renters in these locales. The inclusion of a Trustpilot widget suggests an effort to build trust and credibility with visitors. Technically, the site employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and responsiveness. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party tool, reflecting some attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of privacy policy and terms of service pages limits full compliance assessment. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or explicit vulnerabilities, but the lack of WHOIS registration data and domain registration inconsistencies raise concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redwoodestates.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a local estate agent specializing in sales and lettings within targeted London postcodes. Its business model revolves around property brokerage services, catering primarily to local residents and investors. The presence of Trustpilot integration indicates a focus on reputation management and customer feedback. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the content. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a localized market focus. Growth potential may be tied to expanding digital presence and improving compliance and trust signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The cookie consent banner is a positive privacy feature, but the absence of privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, indicating limited transparency in security management. The domain WHOIS data is missing and flagged as invalid by the registry, which is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML snippet. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in compliance documentation, security headers, and domain registration clarity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Investigate and resolve domain registration issues to ensure legitimacy and avoid potential trust problems.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  4. Clearly display contact information including verified company emails, phone numbers, and physical address to improve business credibility.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Redwood Estates
Description
Redwood Estates - Property for Sale & Rent in E1, E14, E16, E3, Custom House, Canary Wharf, Limehouse, Popular, Silver Town, North Woolwich, Canning Town, London
Key services
Estate agency, Property sales, Property lettings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, SweetAlert2, ComplyDog Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Trustpilot, ComplyDog Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, indicating domain registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with a third-party tool (ComplyDog).
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No explicit contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Trustpilot widget is embedded, indicating some trust signals.
  7. Website uses modern front-end technologies and fonts.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No analytics scripts explicitly detected in the provided snippet.
  10. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography, and SweetAlert2 is included for enhanced UI alerts. The cookie consent is managed by ComplyDog, a third-party service. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a lightweight CMS or framework not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA or advanced accessibility tags detected in the snippet. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags, enhancing social media sharing and search engine indexing. Hosting provider and CMS details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redwoodestates.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redwoodestates.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.