Skip to main content

Security report for redis.com

Redis · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redis.io is the official website for Redis, a leading real-time data platform widely adopted by developers and enterprises. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products including Redis Cloud, Redis Software, and Redis Open Source, targeting developers building AI applications and real-time data solutions. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern web technologies such as Next.js, React, and integrations with analytics and personalization tools. Hosting is primarily on AWS, with integrations supporting major cloud providers like Google Cloud and Azure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are not published on the site. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, Redis.io presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically advanced platform with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of redis.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redis.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
35
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Redis holds a strong market position as a technology leader in in-memory databases and real-time data platforms. Its business model combines open source software with enterprise-grade cloud services and professional support. The target audience includes developers, AI application builders, and enterprises requiring fast, scalable data solutions. The company leverages partnerships with major cloud providers and maintains a global presence. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization focused on developer engagement and enterprise adoption. Revenue streams likely include cloud subscriptions, software licenses, and professional services. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on digital engagement and self-service.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers or updates, indicating good baseline security. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may hinder trust from security-conscious users. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for enhancement. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools is moderate, but no sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were identified. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with more explicit policies and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security and data protection inquiries to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Redis
Description
Developers love Redis. Unlock the full potential of the Redis database with Redis Enterprise and start building blazing fast apps.
Key services
Redis Cloud, Redis Software, Redis Open Source, Redis for AI, Redis Insight, Redis Data Integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, TypeScript, Rive animations, Redis database, Hotjar, HockeyStack, Mutiny personalization
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
AWS (inferred from DNS and name servers), Google Cloud, Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer and update prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, HockeyStack, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HockeyStack, Mutiny
Marketing tools
Mutiny personalization
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page content.
  4. Strong branding and professional design consistent with a major technology company.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the main site.
  8. Domain WHOIS data indicates a well-established domain with privacy protection.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Next.js and React, delivering fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Hosting on AWS with multiple AWS DNS servers indicates a robust infrastructure. The site uses advanced animations (Rive), personalization (Mutiny), and analytics (Hotjar, HockeyStack, Google Tag Manager) to enhance user experience and marketing effectiveness. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, supporting inclusive design. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management approach. Overall, the technical implementation is strong with minor opportunities for improvement in security headers and DNS configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.