Skip to main content

Security report for redcross.lt

Lietuvos Raudonasis Kryžius · Non-profit · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lietuvos Raudonasis Kryžius is a Lithuanian non-profit humanitarian organization focused on protecting human lives and dignity through various services including humanitarian aid, community preparedness, first aid education, and psychological health programs. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and WooCommerce platforms, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enforced and a moderate performance profile. However, some embedded media content is broken, and explicit security headers are not fully implemented. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating a compliance gap. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the organization's Lithuanian identity, though the domain is relatively new, possibly indicating a recent rebranding or new domain acquisition. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redcross.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention redcross.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for redcross.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit humanitarian sector, targeting Lithuanian residents in need of aid, donors, and volunteers. Its business model relies on donations, partnerships with local businesses, and volunteer engagement. The website features multiple donation options, partner acknowledgments, and educational activities, indicating a mature partnership ecosystem and diversified revenue streams. The presence of structured data and social media integration supports digital maturity. The recent domain registration suggests a possible domain change or new digital initiative. The organization maintains a strong market position as a national humanitarian entity with consistent branding and clear communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable analytics and tracking services. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also poses compliance risks under GDPR. Broken video links may affect user trust and experience. Incident response contact information is not provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with better header implementation, policy disclosures, and media content maintenance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly expose a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  4. Fix or remove broken embedded video content to enhance user experience and reduce negative perceptions.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact channels to improve security incident handling and communication.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Lietuvos Raudonojo Kryžiaus Draugija
Registration number
190679146
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lietuvos Raudonasis Kryžius
Description
Lietuvos Raudonasis Kryžius – valstybės pagalbininkė humanitarinėje srityje, kurios veiklos tikslas apsaugoti žmonių gyvybes ir orumą.
Key services
Humanitarian aid, Community preparedness training, First aid education, Psychological health programs, Volunteer coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, YITH WooCommerce Booking Premium, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook, Ajax Search Pro
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed credentials in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit humanitarian organization site
  2. Content is primarily in Lithuanian language
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the provided content
  4. Multiple donation options and partner links are present
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact information
  7. Videos embedded have playback errors indicating media source issues
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce and YITH WooCommerce Booking Premium plugins, indicating e-commerce and booking capabilities. It uses jQuery and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook. The hosting is associated with Telia Lietuva and uses hostex.lt name servers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and CSS presets. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include broken media content and missing security headers which could impact user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redcross.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redcross.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.