Skip to main content

Security report for recovermycar.com

OpenTV Inc. · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RecovR is a specialized vehicle theft recovery service offered exclusively through car dealerships, providing GPS tracking devices and a mobile app to help vehicle owners locate stolen or parked vehicles. The company, operating under OpenTV Inc., positions itself as a niche player in the transportation security market with a focus on consumer peace of mind and insurance benefits. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, and Intercom, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation and relevant content focused on vehicle theft prevention and recovery. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site scores moderately high on content quality and business credibility but should address privacy compliance and security header implementation to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching recovermycar.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RecovR targets vehicle owners concerned about theft, leveraging partnerships with car dealerships to distribute its GPS tracking devices and services. The business model is B2C with a one-time payment structure, supplemented by insurance discounts and cash warranties to incentivize adoption. The company maintains a moderate market position as a specialized provider in vehicle security technology. Its digital presence includes active social media channels and customer testimonials, supporting brand trust. The use of modern analytics and marketing tools indicates an investment in customer engagement and data-driven insights. However, the absence of WHOIS transparency and cookie consent mechanisms may impact regulatory compliance and customer trust. Growth opportunities include expanding dealership partnerships and enhancing privacy and security features to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no evident exposure of sensitive data. The use of third-party analytics and customer support tools like Heap Analytics and Intercom introduces moderate tracking but no overt vulnerabilities were detected. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency. The absence of a cookie consent banner suggests incomplete GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy controls, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and customer trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and reduce tracking footprint.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OpenTV Inc.
Description
RecovR offers a vehicle theft recovery solution available exclusively through car dealerships, providing GPS tracking, alerts, insurance discounts, and cash warranty benefits.
Key services
Vehicle theft location sharing with law enforcement, Parked vehicle location tracking, Insurance rate discounts, Cash warranty for unrecovered stolen vehicles, Mobile app for vehicle tracking and alerts, 24/7 nationwide service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Intercom, jQuery, YouTube embed, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Heap Analytics, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom, Heap Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone numbers.
  6. No forms detected on main page; minimal data collection visible.
  7. Content is focused on vehicle theft recovery and related services.
  8. Social media presence is linked but no direct partner or subsidiary domains identified.
  9. Security headers are not explicitly detected; opportunity for improvement.
  10. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern front-end technologies and third-party integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, and Intercom for marketing and customer support. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is basic but present with meta tags and Open Graph titles. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which is a technical anomaly that should be addressed to ensure domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with recovermycar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review recovermycar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.