Skip to main content

Security report for reatonapdare.lv

SIA Reaton · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Reaton is a well-established Latvian company specializing in construction finishing materials and renovation solutions, offering fixed-price packages and professional consultation services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive business information targeting residential and business clients in Latvia. Technically, the site uses modern libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though improvements are recommended in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic but present, including cookie consent and a privacy policy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though WHOIS data unavailability limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reatonapdare.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reatonapdare.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reatonapdare.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Latvia's construction and finishing materials sector, leveraging a business model focused on bundled product packages with consulting and delivery. Their target audience includes homeowners and business clients with multiple properties or projects. The website showcases partnerships with reputable manufacturers and provides detailed contact and company registration information, enhancing credibility. Growth potential is supported by flexible offerings and personalized solutions. The marketing ecosystem includes standard analytics and retargeting tools, supporting customer acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and basic privacy mechanisms in place. However, the absence of key security headers and explicit incident response or security policy pages indicates room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but further enhancements in transparency and data protection officer contact details are advisable. The use of third-party tracking scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate privacy risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and appointing a data protection officer.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Reaton
VAT number
LV40003015277
Registration number
40003015277
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Reaton
Description
SIA Reaton is one of the largest multi-sector companies in Latvia with over 30 years in the market, having completed more than 5000 construction projects nationwide. The company offers fixed-price finishing material packages with professional consultation and delivery services under the “Mājokļa saimnieks” program.
Key services
Finishing material packages (Basic, Standard, Premium), Professional consultation, Material delivery, Customized solutions for business clients
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.2, jQuery 3.x, Slick Slider, FancyBox, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with consent
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple contact methods including email, phone, physical addresses, and forms.
  5. Use of common marketing and analytics tools with moderate tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Business information is detailed and consistent with Latvian market.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; no content restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap 4 and jQuery, utilizing popular plugins for sliders and modals. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reatonapdare.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reatonapdare.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.