Skip to main content

Security report for realitniportalpraha.cz

Blue Partners s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Real estate portal of Prague is an official municipal platform providing listings for flats, houses, nonresidential spaces, lands, and projects managed by the city of Prague. It targets citizens and potential tenants interested in municipal assets, offering transparent access to property information and bidding opportunities. The portal is operated by Blue Partners s.r.o., a company specializing in such services, and is well integrated with Prague's official digital ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA to ensure usability, tracking, and security. The site is hosted via Active24, a reputable provider, and uses HTTPS with basic security measures. However, it lacks advanced security headers and a published security policy. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent banner and opt-out mechanism, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service are found on the main page. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realitniportalpraha.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal holds a strong market position as the official municipal real estate listing service for Prague, providing a transparent platform for citizens to access and bid on municipal properties. Its business model is government-backed, focusing on public asset management rather than commercial profit. The portal's integration with related municipal sites and its newsletter service indicate a mature digital presence targeting local residents and businesses. The partnership with Blue Partners s.r.o. suggests professional management and development. The absence of phone contact and physical address may reflect the portal's digital-first approach. The portal's growth potential lies in expanding digital services and improving user engagement through newsletters and news articles.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. The presence of cookie consent aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and tracking with user consent. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting recommended HTTP headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and comprehensive meta tags for better search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Blue Partners s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blue Partners s.r.o.
Description
Real estate portal of Prague offering flats, nonresidentials, houses, parcels, and projects managed by the city of Prague.
Key services
Listing of flats, houses, nonresidential spaces, lands, and projects, Newsletter subscription for new bids, Contact and information services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v2, CookieConsent v3, ResponsiveSlides.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-out mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal real estate portal for Prague with official content.
  2. Uses modern frontend technologies and standard tracking tools with consent.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  4. Contact available via email and contact form but no phone or physical address explicitly listed.
  5. Security practices are basic but include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4.4.1 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Google services for analytics and reCAPTCHA. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, which aids performance and reliability. The presence of cookie consent and opt-out mechanisms shows attention to privacy compliance. However, the site lacks advanced SEO structured data and some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. The hosting provider Active24 is consistent with the domain registrar, indicating a stable infrastructure. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to modernize frameworks and improve security headers and metadata for better compliance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realitniportalpraha.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realitniportalpraha.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.