Skip to main content

Security report for re-flow.co.uk

Re-flow · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Re-flow is a UK-based company founded in 2015 that offers a comprehensive field operations software platform designed to streamline workforce management, compliance, scheduling, and real-time communication for industries such as highways, civils, utilities, and commercial landscaping. The platform is trusted by thousands of users and features strong client testimonials, case studies, and industry awards, positioning it as a leading solution in its market segment. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks like Vue.js, integrates with multiple analytics and marketing platforms including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity, and uses secure HTTPS connections with a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy platform for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching re-flow.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Re-flow operates a SaaS business model targeting field operations managers and companies in transportation, construction, utilities, and landscaping sectors. Its competitive advantages include a unified platform replacing multiple apps and paper processes, strong industry partnerships, and a focus on compliance and real-time operational visibility. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription fees for software access. The company shows growth indicators through client testimonials and case studies from notable clients. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with HubSpot, Wistia, and various analytics and advertising platforms. Strategic observations highlight the company's emphasis on digital transformation and sustainability, as well as its commitment to customer support and continuous product innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure program represents gaps in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Develop and publish terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing contact details for a Data Protection Officer to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Re-flow
Description
Re-flow provides a field operations software platform designed to unify and streamline workforce management, compliance, scheduling, and real-time communication for industries such as highways, civils, utilities, and commercial landscaping.
Key services
Field service management, Construction project management, Construction scheduling, Digital forms and inspections, Real-time job and workflow management, Asset tracking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, TypeScript, Vue.js (implied by .ts and .vue files), Wistia video embeds, HubSpot forms and analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel, Apollo.io tracking, Sentry error monitoring
Frameworks
Vue.js, Headless UI
Platforms
HubSpot, Wistia
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Apollo.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong presence of client testimonials and case studies.
  3. Comprehensive use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Clear cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy present.
  5. No explicit security or privacy policy pages found.
  6. No visible contact emails, but phone contact and contact/demo forms are present.
  7. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js and Headless UI, with extensive integration of third-party analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Sentry for error monitoring. Video content is delivered via Wistia, enhancing user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. No common CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain is registered with GoDaddy. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities to improve security documentation and formal compliance disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with re-flow.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review re-flow.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.