Skip to main content

Security report for rchocolate.lv

SIA R CHOCOLATE · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R Chocolate is a small artisan chocolate producer based in Trikāta, Latvia, founded in 2013. The company focuses on crafting high-quality chocolates and seasonal ice cream, distributing products through over 20 retail chains in Latvia and exporting to the Netherlands. Their website reflects a well-branded, content-rich presence targeting gourmet chocolate consumers and retail customers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Slider Revolution and Contact Form 7, and uses Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rchocolate.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rchocolate.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rchocolate.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, producing artisan chocolates and seasonal ice cream. Its business model combines manufacturing with retail distribution and export. The presence in multiple retail chains and export markets indicates growth and market acceptance. Customer testimonials and a detailed company timeline enhance credibility. The website targets chocolate enthusiasts and retail buyers, emphasizing quality and tradition. The lack of detailed privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and risk management. No suspicious domains or partners were identified.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and standard WordPress security practices but lacks advanced security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security contact information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish policies, and maintain updated software to enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider performing a security audit and penetration test to identify and remediate hidden risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA R CHOCOLATE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA R CHOCOLATE
Description
R Chocolate is a family business founded in 2013, producing artisan chocolates and seasonal ice cream in Trikāta, Latvia. The company emphasizes slow, quality growth, sharing the secrets of chocolate making and highlighting the diverse flavors and positive qualities of chocolate. They supply over 20 retail chains in Latvia and export to the Netherlands.
Key services
Artisan chocolate production, Seasonal ice cream production, Retail sales through physical stores and retail chains, Export to international markets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Slider Revolution 5.4.6.4, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, Google Analytics, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based artisan chocolate producer site with good content and design.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.1 with popular plugins such as Slider Revolution and Contact Form 7, and uses jQuery 3.7.1. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics. The site uses a responsive design with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some heavy images and slider scripts. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from performance and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rchocolate.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rchocolate.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.