Skip to main content

Security report for razvoj-podezelja.si

Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom · Non-profit · Slovenia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom is a small non-profit organization based in Slovenia focused on rural development and community support in the region between Snežnik and Nanos. The organization manages projects, organizes local events such as markets and community gatherings, and collaborates with local stakeholders to promote sustainable rural growth. Their website serves as an information hub for news, projects, and contact details, targeting local residents, farmers, artisans, and regional partners. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS using common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a moderately optimized and mobile-friendly user experience. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching razvoj-podezelja.si

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit entity with a clear regional focus, leveraging EU and public funds for project execution. Their business model centers on community engagement and rural development initiatives, positioning them as a key local actor in their sector. The website reflects a consistent branding approach with moderate professionalism and trust indicators such as official registration numbers and detailed contact information. Partnerships with local organizations and service providers are evident, enhancing their operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular event announcements and project updates, although digital marketing and analytics capabilities appear minimal.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens and email obfuscation techniques, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which limits user data exposure but also reduces insight into user behavior. The site should improve security headers and implement privacy and cookie policies to enhance compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom
Registration number
1175688000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom
Description
Non-profit organization focused on rural development in the region between Snežnik and Nanos in Slovenia. They organize projects, events, and provide community support related to agriculture, local culture, and rural development.
Key services
Project consulting and management, Organizing local events and markets, Community development and support, Information dissemination and networking
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, MooTools, Artisteer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • CSRF token present in scripts
  • Email obfuscation via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Slovenian language targeting local community.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple phone numbers and emails.
  5. Website uses Joomla CMS with common JavaScript libraries.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
  9. Website content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and MooTools, indicating a traditional but stable infrastructure. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive, though accessibility features are basic. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags for content type and viewport settings. However, the absence of modern security headers and analytics tools suggests technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicit, and no CDN or advanced performance optimizations were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with razvoj-podezelja.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review razvoj-podezelja.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.