Skip to main content

Security report for razorbackfoundation.com

Razorback Foundation · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Razorback Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 2002 that supports University of Arkansas Razorback Athletics. It focuses on providing scholarships, funding athletic facilities, and supporting student-athlete development. The foundation operates a membership and fundraising model targeting Razorback fans and supporters, offering various membership levels and benefits. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear calls to action for donations and membership. Technically, the website uses a custom or unknown CMS with JavaScript libraries including jQuery 2.1.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. However, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced security. The domain is registered since 2002 with no privacy protection, consistent with the organization's history. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA protecting forms, but the absence of published security policies, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts represent compliance and transparency gaps. User tracking via Google Analytics is moderate, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security practices to better protect users and demonstrate regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching razorbackfoundation.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Razorback Foundation holds a strong market position as the official philanthropic organization supporting Arkansas Razorback Athletics. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing history, official university affiliation, and comprehensive membership programs. Revenue streams primarily come from membership dues, donations, ticketing, and fundraising events. The target customer segment includes Razorback fans, alumni, and local supporters. The foundation maintains partnerships with official ticketing and merchandise platforms, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include new fundraising initiatives like the Razorback Raffle and updated branding efforts. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital engagement and compliance improvements to sustain donor trust and expand membership.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive controls. However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, and no published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but compliance gaps exist regarding privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. The security culture appears basic, with room to enhance transparency and user trust through published policies and improved technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and enhance user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Razorback Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Razorback Foundation
Description
The Razorback Foundation partners with Razorback Athletics in providing support to more than 460 student-athletes in the classroom and in competition. It supports scholarships, student-athlete development opportunities, facility construction and renovations, and other operations of the Athletic Department designed to enhance the student-athlete experience.
Key services
Membership programs, Annual fund donations, Ticketing and parking management, Scholarship funding, Athletic facility support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit foundation supporting University of Arkansas athletics.
  2. Clear and consistent branding with official Razorback logos and colors.
  3. Multiple membership and donation options integrated with official ticketing and donation platforms.
  4. Contact information is prominently displayed including physical address, phone, email, and contact form.
  5. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, and no advanced security headers detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including jQuery 2.1.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices with proper meta tags. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich media content. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms like WordPress or Drupal. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registrar is Tucows Domains Inc. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to DNS attacks and clickjacking. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with razorbackfoundation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review razorbackfoundation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.