Skip to main content

Security report for razomforukraine.org

Razom · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Razom is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Ukraine through humanitarian aid, advocacy, cultural promotion, and community engagement. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive program descriptions and active social media integration, positioning Razom as a credible and impactful entity in its sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis but is likely justified given the organization's geopolitical context. Overall, Razom's website is professional, trustworthy, and effective in communicating its mission and services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching razomforukraine.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Razom operates in the non-profit sector focusing on Ukraine-related humanitarian and cultural initiatives. It leverages a donor and volunteer community to fund and execute programs such as frontline medical aid, healthcare system strengthening, grassroots NGO support, legislative advocacy, and cultural events. The organization maintains a strong brand presence and engages audiences through multiple social media channels. Its business model relies on donations and community involvement, with a clear emphasis on transparency and impact. The website content and structure support donor engagement and program awareness, indicating a strategic approach to growth and influence within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive information. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party scripts and tracking pixels is standard but should be monitored for updates and security risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but can be improved with better policy disclosures and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure they are up to date and free from vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Razom
Description
Razom is dedicated to upholding the principles of the Revolution of Dignity (Maidan) and actively contributing to the establishment of a secure, prosperous, and democratic Ukraine by creating, inspiring, and collaborating on initiatives that motivate people to think, partner and do.
Key services
Razom Heroes - life-saving aid to first responders and frontline medics, Razom Health - strengthening healthcare systems, Razom Relief - investing in grassroots NGOs, Razom Advocacy - advancing legislation and policy, Razom Connect - promoting Ukrainian voices through education, volunteering, and arts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.31.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5.15.4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mailchimp, Events Manager plugin, Instagram Feed Pro plugin, Premium Addons for Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked menus.
  4. Multiple social media profiles linked, indicating active community engagement.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and plugins consistent with WordPress standards.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content or metadata.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit data protection officer or incident response contact information found.
  9. Website content is focused on non-profit humanitarian aid and cultural promotion.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using Elementor page builder and several plugins for events, social feeds, and marketing integrations. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and icons. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are employed for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with razomforukraine.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review razomforukraine.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.