Skip to main content

Security report for ratpdev.com

RATP Dev · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RATP Dev is a global operator specializing in the operation and maintenance of urban and interurban transportation networks across five continents. The company offers a wide range of services including metro, tramway, bus, train, sightseeing, demand-responsive transport, and specialized services for persons with reduced mobility. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong international presence and multiple subsidiaries. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, uses modern analytics and mapping technologies, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some privacy measures, but lacks explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and branding align with the known RATP Group. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ratpdev.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RATP Dev holds a strong market position as a global transportation operator affiliated with the RATP Group. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive transport operation and maintenance services to municipalities and public transport authorities. The company leverages a broad international footprint with over 120 subsidiaries and offices worldwide. Key competitive advantages include diversified transport modes, certifications, and a commitment to sustainable and innovative mobility solutions. The website's content and linked domains reinforce the company's extensive partnership ecosystem and operational scale. Growth indicators include recent contract awards and expansion into new regions. The target customer segments are public sector entities and urban mobility planners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, anonymized IP tracking in analytics, and a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor that should be investigated. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  3. Add recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance contact information availability including official company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RATP Dev
Description
RATP Dev opère et maintient des réseaux de transport urbain et interurbain sur 5 continents. Pour réduire les distances, dynamiser les territoires et rapprocher les hommes.
Key services
Metro operation, Tramway operation, Bus and car services, Train services, Sightseeing transport, Demand-responsive transport (TAD), Transport for persons with reduced mobility (TPMR), Cable transport, Fluvial transport
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Matomo Analytics, Drupal 10 CMS, Swiper.js, Tarteaucitron (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about transportation services.
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with Tarteaucitron.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  6. Multiple international references and subsidiaries listed.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Tarteaucitron for cookie consent management. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, and Google Maps API for tracking and mapping functionalities. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve SEO by adding missing meta tags and enhancing security headers. Hosting provider details were not identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ratpdev.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ratpdev.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.