Skip to main content

Security report for rangerover.com

Jaguar Land Rover Limited · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website https://www.rangerover.com/en-xi/market-selector/index.html serves as a market selector portal for the Range Rover brand, operated by Jaguar Land Rover Limited. It allows users to select their region and market to access localized content. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and uses modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager CMS, JavaScript ES modules, and performance monitoring tools like Adobe Helix RUM and mPulse. The technical infrastructure indicates a mature digital presence with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and detailed security policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly, but the website content and branding strongly suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and targeted at a global automotive audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rangerover.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Range Rover, under Jaguar Land Rover Limited, is positioned as a premium luxury automotive brand with a global market presence. The website supports this by providing localized market access, enhancing customer engagement worldwide. The business model focuses on vehicle marketing and customer experience, leveraging digital platforms for brand consistency and regional customization. The use of advanced CMS and tracking tools indicates investment in digital marketing and analytics. The lack of direct contact information or privacy policy on this page suggests these may be located elsewhere on the main site. The company operates at an enterprise scale within the transportation sector, targeting affluent customers and automotive enthusiasts globally.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR principles. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness communication. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy verification but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by adopting additional security headers and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from all pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to strengthen incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize risk from external dependencies.
  5. Consider resolving WHOIS data visibility issues to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Description
Choose your market and language to explore Range Rover’s official website in your region.
Key services
Vehicle information and marketing, Market-specific website content, Customer engagement via market selection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, Boomerang (mPulse) performance monitoring
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Jaguar Land Rover proprietary platform (Kestrel)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, mPulse (Boomerang)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Helix RUM, mPulse (Boomerang)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a market selector page for Range Rover brand
  2. Content is well structured with region and country selection
  3. No direct contact information or privacy policy links found on this page
  4. Cookie consent modal present with clear analytics cookie explanation
  5. Use of modern JavaScript modules and Adobe Experience Manager CMS
  6. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern but not definitive of illegitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript ES modules and asynchronous script loading for performance. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM for real user monitoring, and mPulse for performance analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with some advanced monitoring tools in place. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicit. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rangerover.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rangerover.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.