Skip to main content

Security report for rajapack.be

Raja SA · Retail · Belgium

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RAJAPACK is a leading European B2B provider specializing in packaging, warehouse supplies, and office products. The company operates a professional e-commerce platform targeting business customers primarily in Belgium and across Europe. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multilingual support, comprehensive product categories, and integrated marketing and analytics tools. Security measures such as HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on login forms, and cookie consent management are implemented, reflecting a solid security posture. However, the domain WHOIS data is restricted, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract from the overall legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers and publishing a security policy to further strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rajapack.be

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RAJAPACK holds a strong market position as the European number one in packaging, offering a wide range of products and services including personalized packaging and e-procurement solutions. The business model focuses on wholesale and e-commerce sales to B2B customers. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages partnerships across multiple European countries through sister websites. Customer trust is supported by verified reviews and clear contact information. The company’s digital ecosystem integrates advanced search (Algolia), consent management (OneTrust), and analytics (Google Tag Manager, Dynatrace, AB Tasty) to optimize customer experience and marketing effectiveness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on critical forms, indicating attention to security best practices. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) suggests room for improvement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers and formalizing security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Raja SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raja SA
Description
De Europese nr.1 in verpakking, biedt verpakkingen, magazijnbenodigdheden en kantoorartikelen aan bedrijven.
Key services
Packaging products, Warehouse supplies, Office supplies, E-procurement solutions, Personalized packaging, Large quantity orders, Delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, ThankYou.io, OneTrust Consent Management, Dynatrace RUM
Platforms
INTERSHOP e-commerce platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on login and password reset forms
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Dynatrace RUM, AB Tasty
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty
Tracking pixels
ThankYou.io, Dynatrace RUM
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B e-commerce platform for packaging products.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management.
  3. Multiple language and regional versions available indicating international presence.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. Secure login and password reset forms with reCAPTCHA integration.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting domain registration transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the INTERSHOP e-commerce platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Algolia for search, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Dynatrace for performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloading strategies for fonts and images. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CDN usage. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, though improvements in security headers and accessibility compliance are recommended to future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rajapack.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rajapack.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.