Skip to main content

Security report for raidboxes.de

RAIDBOXES GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RAIDBOXES GmbH operates a professional WordPress hosting service based in Germany, targeting website creators, agencies, and WooCommerce users. The company offers managed hosting solutions optimized for WordPress performance, security, and sustainability, serving over 17,000 customers including notable brands. Their business model is subscription-based with tiered hosting plans and value-added services such as AI-assisted site creation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern Gutenberg blocks, integrates SEO and cookie compliance tools, and uses Cloudflare DNS. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and well-structured, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, good privacy compliance, and a strong market position in the German WordPress hosting sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raidboxes.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention raidboxes.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,005
Employees
0
Customers
2,005
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for raidboxes.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RAIDBOXES GmbH is positioned as a leading German WordPress hosting provider with a clear focus on managed hosting, WooCommerce, and high-traffic solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in performance optimization, expert support, and sustainability commitments. The company leverages partnerships and client testimonials to build credibility. Revenue streams are primarily subscription fees from hosting plans. The target customers include agencies, website owners, and e-commerce operators. Growth indicators include a large customer base and continuous product updates such as AI site assistant integration. The partnership ecosystem includes scheduling services (Calendly) and status monitoring platforms. Strategic observations suggest RAIDBOXES is focused on expanding its market share through technology innovation and customer-centric services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. Security best practices such as no exposed sensitive data and controlled live chat access are observed. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could enhance DNS security. No known vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated by formalizing security governance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to improve trust and responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RAIDBOXES GmbH
Description
WordPress Hosting aus Deutschland: schnell, sicher & klimafreundlich. 17.000 Kunden vertrauen uns.
Key services
Managed WordPress Hosting, WooCommerce Hosting, High-Traffic WordPress Hosting, Email Hosting, Domain Registration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gutenberg Blocks, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Rank Math SEO Plugin, Mega Menu Block, RB Custom Blocks
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism
  • Live chat with controlled access

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on German WordPress hosting market with clear business model.
  3. Use of modern WordPress technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with Iubenda integration.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. Domain registration data is transparent and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Gutenberg blocks and custom RB blocks, ensuring modular and maintainable content. Integration with Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager supports performance and analytics needs. The site loads quickly and is fully responsive, providing excellent user experience across devices. SEO is well implemented with Rank Math PRO plugin and comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. The use of Iubenda for cookie compliance demonstrates attention to privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal, though enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers would further strengthen the infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with scalable and secure architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raidboxes.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raidboxes.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.