Skip to main content

Security report for radnica.org

Radnica.org · Non-profit · Croatia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radnica.org is a Croatian non-profit platform dedicated to supporting individuals facing workplace discrimination, particularly gender-based discrimination. The website offers educational content, guidance on rights, and an anonymous reporting form to help victims. It is affiliated with CESI, a recognized organization, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern web fonts and scripts, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for form protection, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves a niche audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radnica.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the non-profit sector focusing on anti-discrimination and workers' rights in Croatia. Its business model centers on providing information and support rather than commercial services. The partnership with CESI suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The target audience includes women and other individuals vulnerable to workplace discrimination. The site’s content quality and branding are consistent, supporting its mission. Revenue streams are not evident, typical for non-profits. Growth potential lies in expanding awareness and support services. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a focus on anonymity and privacy.

Security posture

Radnica.org demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to protect form submissions. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. The site respects user privacy with cookie consent and no visible tracking beyond necessary scripts. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be improved with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and security contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Consider providing verified contact emails with anti-spam measures for better communication.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radnica.org
Description
Radnica.org is a platform focused on helping and protecting individuals facing discrimination, particularly gender-based discrimination in the workplace. It provides information, resources, and a channel to report discrimination while respecting user anonymity.
Key services
Information on discrimination, Guidance on steps to take if discriminated, Rights education, Reporting discrimination via anonymous form
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on anti-discrimination and workers' rights in Croatian language.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security headers in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent and captcha.
  7. Partner affiliation with CESI visible via logo link.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted likely on Webflow’s platform, leveraging modern web fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit. It uses jQuery 3.5.1 and Finsweet Cookie Consent for GDPR compliance, along with Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection on forms. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed technical documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the site’s purpose but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radnica.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radnica.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.